安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
That depends on context. If you are speaking to people, it can be singular or plural, if you are playing DnD and saying "You blah blah blah" that is second person narration. Saying something like "You, go do (insert action)" isn't narration of events, it's a command.
No.
Again.. just butchering the language doesn't mean it's correct. "You" is always singular.
"ALL of you" still would be "ALL" being the plural... "you" being a direction those "ALL" are in.
And "75%" is the amount of people in the location of "You".. instead of pointing out each 1% of "You".
But this is just more ways the language has been degraded that people don't understand the meaning of words... slang, euphemisms, cropping, shorting, etc... is wrong even if it's used it's used incorrectly...
That too doesn't mean since some use it wrong EVERYONE must use the words wrong...
It is plural and singular, ALL and you can be plural.
To use DnD, Let's say the HM says "you walk into a dungeon and blah blah blah" You can be talking to one individual, or the group as a whole, in which case it is plural.
So what ~you~ are saying is "All of all"? or "75% of 75%" or "you of you"?... that's double talk if "all of you" is "you of you"
When a Dungeon master says "you" he's saying ~ to you ~ "You"... he wouldn't say ( as an example ) "John and Bill and Sara and Robert and Sam and..." he's directing it to YOU singular rather then EACH PERSON INDIVIDUALLY... because he ~shortened~ "you ALL" to just "you".
Like I said... misusing and not using "all" but only using the last part still doesn't make it "plural"
Now I'm done trying to explain it to ~you~... ~you're~ obviously not understanding how English works.
No, "all of you" All and you is plural, with all giving context to whether you is plural or singular.
It's addressing MULTIPLE PEOPLE. AS IN, it's PLURAL. If it was singular, it would only be referencing one person, but you just admitted you can be used instead of saying "John Bill Sara Robert and Sam.
ALL in "you all" is just specifying that the "you" in question is plural not singular, but you can remove the all, because you can be plural or singular, referring to a group or an individual.
and the biggest piece of "evidence" of transness being a "recruitment" thing is about as good a proof of it as it would be to deem left-handedness a matter of "social contagion"
"you" used to be plural, while "thou" was the singular form of the word
"you" quite literally used to be exclusively plural
Someone wants equal rights? I'm going to treat them like how I treat everyone else then. Most sane or rational people and even most insane or irrational people don't make these kinds of demands. I'm not going to give someone special treatment solely because they've got some whim that needs sating or some desire to control the conversation.
Plus there's a correlation between people who make said demands in the first place with being absolutely toxic individuals to have any sort of correspondence with. And I'm using that word, "toxic" unironically here. Controlling, manipulative, conniving wretches whose sole joy in life is imposing their will upon everyone and everything then immediately playing the part of the victim the minute anyone calls them out on their ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.
Useful idiots, but idiots nonetheless due to not realizing that the reason why they're permitted to get away with being massive entitled ♥♥♥♥♥ to everyone around them is because it's convenient to certain groups who see them as naught more than a cudgel to use on those who espouse dissent and show discontent with the status quo. These people are sick and need help, not enabling.
Good for you, want a cookie with your name on it? If anything, being trans yourself, means your opinion is extremely biased and not to be trusted, as it will be skewed in a pro-LGBTQ+ direction regardless of facts.
This game begs to differ :
https://store.steampowered.com/app/736260/Baba_Is_You/
...what's even better is that it operates on consistent logic.
"YOU" can be as many things as someone decides to include in "YOU", just like "ALL", and "everyone" which don't usually mean "the entirety of reality" or "everyone to ever exist".
What's unique about the word "YOU", though, is that it refers to a singular entity, however, that entity may be composed of multiple individuals who are operating in coordination with each other; in the strictest-sense, we're talking a hivemind but in a much looser sense, we're talking about a team that might operate under a singular online account or company or guild name.
(A real-world example might be something like an FBI sting-operation account. "Who are you Sherry?", Sherry: "I'm just a cute girl who is 16 and is home alone and ready to have some fun", and you might think that Sherry means she is 16 years old, but in reality, Sherry is a single account being operated by a team of 16 FBI agents. You can also tell that she is not a real teenage girl because she used capitalization and no emojis.
This really isn't any different from how other pronouns such as "they" operates, though since at it's core, it's just a linguistic memory pointer[en.wikipedia.org].
maybe it means that i know my ♥♥♥♥, that i'm not talking out of my ass, which i know for a fact you're doing
For a sufficiently difficult game such as Donkey Kong 64, this disparity will be clear to most people, who can look up the exact steps required to achieve 101% but yet fail at accomplishing them many times over.
Now, pronouncing words is sufficiently easier - in languages which don't utilize pitch to vary the meaning of words (such as Chinese), I personally am capable of mastering any pronunciation after only a few attempts most of the time, however, there are some people who simply aren't capable of doing this. ...even when they know how the end result should be.
Clearly though, in this case, being trans is just used to gatekeep and keep out opposing opinions, which as i said earlier is called an echo chamber.
Also, isn't this "appeal to authority" fallacy, IE: "I'm an authority on this subject, i say X thing is true, therefore X thing must be true"