安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
For the older people, who have seen the gaming world change over the years it might indeed be killing the gaming hobby.
It's just how you look at it.
more games need to be like deep rock galactic no microtransactions, very fun, extremely small knowledge of it, battle pass with no money needed to get the good stuff and funny dwarf man.
who doesn't like funny dwarf man?
Younger gamers probably will probably grow up accustomed to this standard whereas I saw the more golden age of PC gaming in the mid-to-late 90's and early 2000's where ethics, industry and standards were wholly different.
Gaming as a whole is more lucrative, popular and expansive than ever but IMO it's certainly not better and there have been way too many scummy practices and disappointing games over the years. Also outgrowing gaming in part is another element that diminishes how I feel about the hobby.
As stated though, no, they’re not likely meant to kill the golden goose.
The gaming hobby isn't under any risk of being killed. Sure if all you focus about gaming is an specific subset of it (AAA titles, RTS games, MMORPGs) you'll see ups and downs (even some death maybe). But as a whole gaming is a hobby with a very good health and not running short of things to do in it.
The change that has happened is that as the reach and uptake has expanded, so too has the gaming population and as such it has become increasingly more pluralistic. There is now archetypical 'gamer' any more. The industry has grown big enough to have genres, sub-genres, and niches within sub genres.
As a result the Hobby "Feels" like it's breaking down because it's becoming more fragmented from certain perspectives. No gamer has the certainty that to say a game is Good, or Bad because somewghere out there other gamers will push back. MSame for Marketing and Monetization.
From a balanced perspective as a gamer I think we're in a golden age. I have never owned more games than I do now and quite frankltyy i keep seeing new and interesting games to add to my wisghlist.
Some of my friends say "you just don't like gaming anymore" while spending 1000s on digital nonsense in a game and continuing to play it because of the sunk cost fallacy.
I'm not spending over 10 dollars on a game that is broken, full of bugs, and unfinished when there are millions of games out there to play that cost less than that, are complete, and have more love and care in them. Hell, some games are even FREE and better than the junk they release these days.
If you ask me if gaming is dying, and if microtransactions are excessive, I'd say YES to both and that the industry is headed for disaster. With the global market struggling to avoid crashing, games that push microtransactions have another thing coming.
Those games are going to soon only appeal to the whales as they push scummy marketing, poor balance, and even completely stupid tactics. I mean, seriously, Tales of Arise: Day 1 DLC for STORAGE space on an offline game? wtf?
People like playing videogames. People are going to keep playing videogames. If one particular thread of marketing strategies gets too egregious people will just play different videogames.
Really depends on the game, doesn't it?
It's like how several years ago I was seeing how "PC gaming is dead"....
LOL!