Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
It's very hard to create a shooter that's better than Siege, Overwatch, or CS:GO. It's not that the games are bad, it's just that people want the best, and they'll always flock to the games with the most players.
https://store.steampowered.com/app/753650/Due_Process/
^ This is one of the best examples. It's a very good game, there's no doubt about it, but the genre it finds itself in makes it utterly impossible for the product to succeed.
Now imagine investing millions of dollars into a product like Lawbreakers did, only for it to flop. It creates low-quality content, right? Developers are afraid to put time and money into the products they're creating. And low-quality content will always fail, and that's how we're left with this question.
I feel like lawbreakers was just too soon after overwatch and kind of part of that league of legends style fighting game. Its like when wow clones come out but do it poorly...why play it just play wow. At this point a wow clone done correctly may succeed bc wow is so old.
But its true what you say about Buy due process. Its almost like 10 billion people in the world isnt enough and for good games in a niche genre need 50 billion. What I mean is you would think with so many people in the world and so many gamers, even niche genres would get the attention.
But you are right..a few games make up the majority of playerbases. I flock to games with high numbers of players too..or rather I wouldnt bother playing an mmorpg without a good playerbase.
Now this is not to say due process wasnt worth creating and the devs didnt make money. Im sure for several months players were able to enjoy it but these games tend to die off rather quickly. So I suppose for people who like niche genres...you can enjoy these types of treats when they come out just not long term.
Online gaming in a way actually requires a crapload of people for it work anyway in a sense.
However I feel like if a dev expects and creates a game that works centered around a small tightnit community can also succeed highly. Its like guild wars 1...even though that game is old. A hell of a lot of dedicated players have gotten some good gameplay out of it over the last 10 years. Depending on how dedicated and tight a community is can actually keep a smaller game around and alive.
All in all though, yeah people are scared to dump time and money into a game..but I feel like no one has tried to make a simple game to appeal to the masses.
Like I said, lawbreakers tried to target a new audience genre that was already into overwatch. I think it failed in being better than overwatch. Now if someone makes a clone of a game that is old and dead but succeeded I think they will find success.
What about people who have already made a lot of money creating games? Doesnt any of them have any passion to make a new game even though it may fail? Someone who can spend the extra money and if it fails its not a big deal.
I think the first time you play a type of game it is special to you and you enjoy it more than you will most games. So then the rest of the games you play will never feel good enough. In short, you have to be happy with good not great games because great games are rare and going to get harder to find as you have already experienced so much in the gaming world.
However, I kind of agree. I havnt played a game like starbound or terraria since. I havnt played a game like portal since. Clearly dark souls > elden ring. I mean whatever genre you think of the better games probably have came out more than 5 years ago.
I think covid played a role in the last few years being garbage but then again the fact that I dont see many good games coming in the near future sucks and is no excuse.
Then again you have games like stardew valley, slime rancher, mass effect 3 and andromeda, ocean heart, and tales of arise.
Everything changes and a lot of good games now are short and sweet. Because anytime people try to do more it takes away from it.
Overall, yeah what is new that is like an amazing gem of a game? Not much sadly.
Perhaps you need to adjust what you are looking for and your expectations...because I think we are very similar and if I had not I probably would not be playing much right now.
Any particular games you are looking for? Maybe I can help find a gem.
Same, I transitioned to hunting for steam achievements and now playing and good game I played before and going for 100%. It helps alot with having games to play. However, there is definitely still a lack of good games in the last century. Esp mmorpg and online games.
Yeah it seems like there hasn't been a good mmorpg in forever. New World turned out to be a disappointment imo
New world, lost ark probably several others. They try to be too complicated instead of just making a world to explore with grindable content. Literally how many mmorpgs dont even have high droprate items? Something that drives the grind and fun and enjoyment of repetitive content.
To make an mmorpg succeed, you will definitely need to have your players replay content...theres no way you make endless fresh stuff. Therefore you need low droprate items to go after. Pair that with actually fun gameplay and killing stuff with other real people and you succeed. Not too hard. Yet no one makes the right wow clone.