Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
Considering that would violate several laws in America, please provide a citation to prove they did that.
Because literally that company would be metaphorically, and possibly literally a smoldering crater in the ground if they did that in America.
malwarebytes. I've had a prem license for....oh boy a good 6 or 7 years
I would suggest Bitdefender is the better option, as it covers more. Malwarebytes is a decent antivirus for beginners or those that don't want to control the rest. Bitdefender will give you a lot more features outside of just being an antivirus.
Bitdefender offers you Anti-virus, Web Protection, Ad Blocker, Secure Web-browsing for safe banking, Webcam and Microphone usage detection, System optimization tools, Vulnerability checker, Personal data leak check, Wifi protection, optional VPN, Firewall, Ransomware roll back, File shredder, password manager, and parental controls.
Malwarebytes offers just Anti-virus, Web Protection, Ad Blocker, Ransomware roll back, and optional VPN.
The VPN for Malwarebytes would be better, but apart from that, you get equal or better virus detection as well as more features from using Bitdefender. Likely a cheaper price tag too. Malwarebytes will however run more in the background and out of your way, depending what you like.
What no I still am
You what?
https://imgur.com/a/eO2W1Dd
Alright, I'll agree with you there. Don't get me wrong, they are both good security products.
If that was true, there would be no more Norton period.
It would be dead and gone.
No one would ever use it again. They'd be sued into oblivion.
There would literally be nothing left of the company.
Breaking the law does not make a company exist much longer.
I'll do the research later, but do understand in the future, you have to provide evidence of any claim you make, or you instantly must redact it.
Because literally the company would no longer exist. PERIOD.
How are you not getting that?!?!?!
Any company doing that would be destroyed. Utterly and completely.
Ruined. Obliterated. Annihilated.
The fact that Norton still exists and is used by people makes your statement impossible.
Because it goes directly against how the real world functions.
No company would survive doing that. At all.
Heck, the people behind that company might even have them bringing back Burning at the Stake for them!
UGh.
I'm out.
Norton did in deed include a crypto miner with the 360 suite BUT it is still an opt in feature that you have to choose to use.