Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
100% truth
funny how on one hand women/girls will defend wearing the smallest skimpiest most revealing thing possible. Then on the other hand complain about being objectified and seen as 'sexual'. its a comedy show sadly.
Also the argument, well i'm an athlete and i get hot when i run or w/e. So i need to wear the absolute tightest thing possible has been sold to girls through propaganda. You realize by wearing something light weight and loose it'll breath better and you'll stay cool much easier/quicker.
but hey w/e keep on wearing 'shorts' so tight they are literally toilet paper 2.0..
It's a slightly unfair advantage in a competitive environment, and I think we should conduct all future events in skin-tight spandex and frilly leg and wristbands in the future. Y'know, to arbitrarily level the playingfield without granting an unfair advantage to, say, men with polevaulting talents.
seems you have your own ridiculous agenda.
uh huh. so to be a powerful, beautiful, good looking strong woman you just need to wear the tightest most revealing clothing.
got ya.
think we totally got the 'agenda' you're going for. LOL.
you don't need to sexualize women for them to be powerful, beautiful, good looking, or strong.
please stop.
I watch female boxing/mma. It's definitely come a long way, and a couple rose to top level prominence alongside men (in fame/money, that is).
If it was claimed by experts that it frees movement then surely the gain would be equal among female athletes in which case would also be equal if it was say a proper pair of shorts.
Female sportwomen never got the same recognition as their male counterparts as a public wants to see real olympian feats which due to natural body design will always be men 99% of the time.
Add in the fact athletes don't really make a bean without advertising and use to go back to normal working class jobs and you have the recipe for exploitation.
Like a lot of the ways our female of the species behave i would strongly imagine the real suffragettes of the early 1900 would be shocked, outraged even.
Exploiting oneself is the modern excuse but the simple truth remains its still exploitative and still marketed solely to garnish male attention. Completely misses the point and why such incidences will forever relegate women to nothing but a consideration rather than an equal of gender.
the topic IS ABOUT women. hello.... so of course we are talking about women wearing much to revealing clothing.
but thats ok, you keep defending your position of revealing and tight clothing is the best way to promote strength, power, and beauty.
like i said. we get what your 'agenda' is.
Dern & Tecia Torres last weekend at UFC 273 btw, what a battle. They've both done awesome in their recent matches as well.
Second best fight of the night imo, great work by both....second best, after the khamzat Chimaev - Gilbert burns fight.
My ufc 273 thread got "proofed" is it not allowed to talk about combat sports on this forum or is it some mod who just don't like my posts 😂
Hmm may need vpn but u watched this highlight from the Chimaev - Gilbert burns fight earlier.. pretty good highlight clip (youtube can't have fights in full)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivzu5n1wdtE
I wear leggings all the time and no problems
And shorts on summer as well :v
The only thing "cringe" is this thread's question...