Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
maybe with dual boot for now.
I agree, but I think Win7 Pro is better than both... At least from a "privacy" standpoint. Both 10 and presumably 11 have better innate security, but I also don't think Micro$oft fondling my 'puter and everything I could possible do with it, ever, whenever it gets the urge is "secure" either.
No content or data produced using any Microsoft product, and that's including the OS, is free from their scrutiny, collection, analysis, sales, marketing or meta-data dry-humping... per the new Windows 11 end-user User License Agreement.
%^#%## Micro$oft.
PS: To add - All that personal data, everything you've written, drawn, watched, clicked on/whatever that has anything to do with using any Microsoft product on your 'puter is also specifically, intentionally, purposefully user-identifiable, per the new Windows 11 end-user agreement. Yet, nobody out there is saying doo-doo about it, 'cause "money." :/
The other gotcha is if you installed a previous version of Windows using a MBR in which case you have to convert your startup disk from MBR to GPT, as MBR boot doesn't support Secure Boot. Contrary to popular belief you don't have to actually enable Secure Boot as long as Setup can detect it being capable.
As for TPM not being tamper-proof, the idea behind Secure Boot is to ideally exclude the loading of any malicious boot or kernel modules that could read the keys released by the TPM, for instance BitLocker Disk Encryption keys.
All the security functionality that the system requirements are based on are already supported in Windows 10 however Microsoft has decided that these standards should now be baseline. Windows 11 will boot and run without these components, however Microsoft considers this an unsupported state and will most likely show a warning watermark on the desktop wallpaper and in Settings.
Windows 11 is just the next step of turning everything into garbage.
When Windows 10 support will stop, I'll just embrace Linux.
wonder what Linux is.
install Ubuntu on an old laptop.
Then dualboot Manjaro kde on your desktop
(kde looks similar to windows by default, but can be tweaked to look like anything)
going down the Linux rabbit hole, making your own minimal Arch install, distro and desktop hop every couple of weeks/months. (kde plasma is best change my mind)
Get excited everytime a game you paid money on finally works on Linux :D
And all of that in 1 Year. Daily driving linux for about half a year now
Otherwise, there's an old saying. "When Microsoft does it, you're ♥♥♥♥♥♥."
But windows is really dependend on an ssd.
I can say that first hand with my intel celeron laptop, taking windows 10 like 5 minutes to boot up and start edge (most lightweight browser on windows from my experience)
Meanwhile a lightweight linux system boots and starts firefox in 1 Minute.
Although windows is pretty ok with an ssd, which is pretty much the standard on most computers right now if we're honest. But if you run an old hdd, ya gotta prepare for some hefty load times