Out of these 4, what attracts women the most?

[Hanzo The Rain]

In what order would you put from most attractive to the least

Status
Wealth
Personality
Looks
Others (please specify)

[Jonathan Sensei]

I would like to think it's a nice personality. But i'm just guessing to be honest.

[Samwise]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Ⱥrtƒlø:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Samwise:

There still exists stats of what majority likes most, and this topic is about what we guess would be those majorities preferences.

I know what thread is about. I just didn't start writing 1 2 3.... because there is many answers already, and decide to wrote what I think about it.. That all

Alright, accept your excuse... This time.

[Dutchgamer1982]

from studies I've read it is neither of these.
The most attractive trait in a man for woman is the attractiveness of this man to other woman
(or at least being percieved as such)
- being confident in your attitude both body and verbal language is therefore important.
- humor/quirkyness also helps as one usually cannot do that without confidence

money, status looks etc are irrelevant for woman but it may help the man having them feel more secure about himself so their effect is only indirect.

[ice]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Castyles:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Out Of Bubblegum:

Looks
Status
Wealth
Personality

/thread

/thread

Without seeing this I almost replied with the exact same hierarchy, although I'll specify that the difference of importance from looks down to personality relatively small. This is more like the order of operations a woman might assess their attraction to a man in a practical sense

i.e.
Women goes to club

(Looks) Woman sees a handsome stranger on the other side of the club
Step 1: "Who's the hottie?"

(Status) Woman's friend knows who he is
Step 2: "Oh, he's a philanthropist?"

(Wealth) Woman flirts with him and he takes her on a date the very same night
Step 3: "Are you sure you don't want to split the bill? It's $2,000..."

(Personality) Woman tells her friend about him after the first date
Step 4: "All he did was talk about his Aspberger's diagnosis and make Minecraft jokes, even towards the waitress. He just couldn't stop talking about himself either. He's still such a cute and handsome guy and he paid for my dinner so I think I'll get dressed to go see him tonight."

[Fire Angel]

Wealth & fame only attracts gold diggers. This applies for both men & women.

[Devsman]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย xX_ClaymoreHumper_Xx:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Castyles:

/thread

/thread

/thread

[DarkCrystalMethod]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Supergirl:

Wealth & fame only attracts gold diggers. This applies for both men & women.

Lets not be this guy...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BR_LviCwSiY
Thats MY job.
You can tank me later.

[L1qu1dator]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Here is my card:

(...)

and after those

5. Looks
6. the rest don't matter

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQfzwFloVqA

you seen many models dating hobos...?

[Kiddiec͕̤̱͋̿͑͠at 🃏]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Sleepy:

Out of these 4, what attracts women the most?

In what order would you put from most attractive to the least

Status
Wealth
Personality
Looks
Others (please specify)

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย L1qu1dator:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Here is my card:

(...)

and after those

5. Looks
6. the rest don't matter

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQfzwFloVqA

you seen many models dating hobos...?

Implying that the first 2 valued items can't be both so highly valued that both of them are requirements.

...once people have exceeded a certain threshold of attractiveness, though, instead of eliminating options from consideration via their appearance, you can use something else, such as "personality", which makes it the dominant reason for the decision, & the looks secondary - yet both being requirements.

I think that's how both most men & women work, since you can't really tell who someone is just by looking at them but you can just look at someone & tell if you find them physically attractive or not.

Looks are USUALLY going to be the first thing someone is basing their decision off of, but that doesn't mean it's going to be the highest priority thing, even if a certain threshold is often a requirement.



And don't bother changing your personality because that could mean anything.
Terrible people tend to like the personality of other terrible people,
OR of people that they can control.

Maybe someone isn't terrible but is instead rather thoughtless & just wants to surround themselves with other thoughtless people - I see that one happen a lot.

[Kiddiec͕̤̱͋̿͑͠at 🃏]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Sleepy:

Out of these 4, what attracts women the most?

In what order would you put from most attractive to the least

Status
Wealth
Personality
Looks
Others (please specify)

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Here is my card:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย L1qu1dator:

you seen many models dating hobos...?

As I stated, that is how I have experienced things in my life with almost 50 years of experience. You wish to challenge it, be my guest.

There are many cultural and economical and social differences and priorities in here that affects the order that has been presented in this topic, but as I said, I have seen that these are the order in my experience that affects a lot of the choice what attracts women the most.

I understand that you picked the examples as such (hobo and model) to provoke, but if you do think about it, aren't both of them ultimately only humans? What if the model loses its job suddenly and after that his/her house and thus become a hobo, wouldn't he/she still be the same human who was a model just a while ago? Does the status change make him/her more undesirable choice. Maybe it does and maybe it doesn't. Your choice. Now, for what I have seen the status and the wealth are not so important factors when talking about the attraction factors in overall.

You don't live in America do you?

People tend to be extremely classist here, only taking interest in people who are of their same income-class or higher, but rarely pairing with people of different wealth-classes because of... a lot of factors. I can't type them all out & elaborate at the moment but I don't necessarily need to because I recall this video that describes it adequately for everyone except the lower-class & criminally accused :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AL2W3nm-GJ4
Lower-class are actually treated worse than what she describes & criminally accused didn't even necessarily "make a mistake" as enough of them, to be A LOT of people, get framed by corrupt cops who hide, disregard, or destroy exculpatory evidence.
(A problem that the wealthy never have to deal with.)
The stigma created from this is so strong that even she doesn't really address it.

[sleeps]

none. because idk about woman

[L1qu1dator]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Here is my card:

(...)
I understand that you picked the examples as such (hobo and model) to provoke, but if you do think about it, aren't both of them ultimately only humans? What if the model loses its job suddenly and after that his/her house and thus become a hobo, wouldn't he/she still be the same human who was a model just a while ago? Does the status change make him/her more undesirable choice. Maybe it does and maybe it doesn't. Your choice. Now, for what I have seen the status and the wealth are not so important factors when talking about the attraction factors in overall.

I meant model because of their looks not status. Drop dead gorgeous person won't be with some average Joe, who's at the same time a plumber or mechanic (no offense to these jobs, they're far more needed than said model, or actor), no matter how good their personality is.
It's all just a calculation, and personality is considered last in that calculation.

[L1qu1dator]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Here is my card:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย L1qu1dator:

I meant model because of their looks not status. Drop dead gorgeous person won't be with some average Joe, who's at the same time a plumber or mechanic (no offense to these jobs, they're far more needed than said model, or actor), no matter how good their personality is.
It's all just a calculation, and personality is considered last in that calculation.

Okay, that is your calculation. I am not denying it.
(...)

Nah, it's not mine. I'm just its victim.

[Vendicator Senpai]

Hot Wheels collection is what attracts women the most

[Daxank]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Vendicator Senpai:

Hot Wheels collection is what attracts women the most

Damn, that explains so much