Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
Toto téma bylo uzamčeno 
Pravidla a pokyny k diskuzím
Nahlásit tento příspěvek
The movie itself is dark satire comedy...
Dark satire has a strong purpose and meaning behind. Most people just might not understand or face it. However, one thing you NEED to understand: It's mocking the stupidity of actions/behaviours, rather than the individual themselves. It's not actually hating on the person, but rather attempting to force them into facing the issue, addressing it, and figuring out better solutions.
South Park does this too, etc. So some people take offend, but others see it and love it due to that fact there's a purpose for it.
And yet your comment is entirely devoid of anything useful or worthwhile...just an angry response from someone who clearly sees themself mirrored in the satire that disturbs them so.
Hardly surprising that you would take issue with those who correctly identify the falsehoods you spread, and identify your heroes for the racists they are.
Well, I found Majestic Turkey's repeated spamming of that crap to be annoying, so I did a search. That's where I found a critique of Edward Dutton, that identifies him as a white supremacist, who tries to pass his hate off as pseudo-intellectualism.
I find that useful and informative. Much more so than the thinly veiled arguments that are being spammed into this thread.
No, I don't think so.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RationalWiki
Maybe you should be more cautious about where you get your information from? Obviously, people like Majestic Turkey have problems with everything they are trying to do...for good reason.
Perhaps the best advice might be to take a look for yourself and then make up your mind?
I don't have much time for smug ferengi.
I also recommend the original Fahrenheit 451 where reality television and flat screen televisions were predicted years before.
That makes two of us. Scrolling up might be of some help? It's the username of the person who keeps posting Edward Dutton videos in this discussion.
I think that is an excellent recommendation. Interestingly enough, it touches upon "anti-intellectualism", "fascism", and "free speech".
I take issue with the ultimate hypocrites who laughed and laughed about how dumb religious people were
Then when they realized that evolution was incompatible with equality and feminism
*surprised Pikachu face*
rheeeeee!
replace any insult or "ist" from that lot with heretic, that's the simple truth.
It is, but clearly some people don't get that joke.
None were put forward.
The old skeptic saying applies, "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence", the onus is on the creationist to prove their case, not the other way around.
Very inconvenient for you.
Btw nested quotes are a thing, because when your arguments are reducible to deliberate misinterpretations, context matters.
No, what is inconvenient is finding myself having to try and keep this thread from devolving into a white supremacist circle-jerk.
This conversation has nothing to do with "creationists", you brought that garbage in here, and if I had my way, you'd take it with you when you left.
If you have a problem with the RationalWiki article I linked, then address those points directly. I thought it was rather interesting in how it pointed out how this Edward Dutton loser is fond of appearing on various white supremacist programs, because they are so eager to give him a platform...kind of exactly like you.
Yes, I noticed my error and edited my comment just before your most recent contribution.
It's still kind of weenie.
What's inconvenient is when you cite blue hair wiki, which smears Nathan Cofnas, the guy who actually debunks anti jewish literature as "alt right".
It has zero credibility of any kind, and that's kind of the point, the lefto "skeptics" got mad, and went mad in the most hilarious way possible, they became everything they hated.
More ad hominem attacks to support your previous ad hominem attacks, and nothing of substance to show for it.
What's the matter? Not enough attention being generated in your celebrity gossip thread?