安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
I always want a car with a good top-end. That acceleration on the Interstate in the US when truly do need it is right there at your feet. It makes a pretty big difference.
But, I'm talking about more reasonable cars, coupes, and sedans with good engine power and transmissions that can give me a burst of top-end acceleration on-demand, not something like a Lambo... Though, I'd love a Lamborghini, if anyone's buying? :)
I understand it would be quite challenging, without using an engine governor, to make a vehicle that can both achieve an efficient highway speed yet have acceleration and other driving characteristics that are both practical yet safe.
An early 90's family sedan with a 1.6 litre four cylinder carburetted naturally aspirated petrol engine that makes 70kW/160Nm can still get to 100km/h assuming it had an industry standard gearing pattern for the final drive and gearbox, but a 2022 family sedan with a 2.5 litre four cylinder direct-injection, high compression, naturally aspirated petrol using high-grade unleaded that makes 140kW/250Nm this vehicle (Assuming similar weight, which I am basing this on), can reach those speeds much more rapidly, using less fuel and still have plenty of room left to go before it runs out of gearing.
Having driven a myriad of different cars over the years, I'd much rather have and not need than need and not have. A good, efficient and reasonably powerful engine with a good gearbox makes a world of difference when it comes to driving dynamics and enjoyment.
Yeah I'm 37 and never driven a car in my life but my dad owns a Mazda MX5 (i think 1989 model) and he has all the power he needs even though his car probably won't go past 120 kph, But when I'm in the car i keep telling him to slow down and he thinks if i ever drove a car I'd drive like an old granny.
My opinion is just that cars are fast and dangerous so seeing a title asking if speed limits are necessary, I just have a sort of opposite assertion.
Drive.
Do it.
You need to do it if you're physically able. Get whatever the equivalent is of a "Learner's Permit" and/or go take a Driver's Education class and just... do it. Seriously. It's an experience of freedom you need to have, even if you choose to not drive.
In large metropolitan areas, it's not a rare thing that someone has never driven a car. But, even so, that's an experience everyone needs to have, IMO.
I do agree that speed limits are reasonable and understandable in most built-up and areas with considerable traffic, but I do disagree with aggressively enforced speed limits on the very long and open roads we have plenty of in Australia. Our Freeways (In my state) are generally in very good condition and numerous lanes, so having random hidden autonomous cameras pinging people for going three km/h over the limit on a four-lane dual carriageway at midday during the week in a 90 zone that should be 100, I think it's just a bit heavy-handed.
As I mentioned in my previous post, most speed cameras are only places on straight roads where a little extra speed is statistically insignificant, they selectively move the mobile cameras into high-revenue areas rather than actual black spots that have speed related accidents.
I'm by no means an aggressive driver who hoons around town a clapped-out AU Ford Falcon doing single-peggers off at the lights, but I do like to hear the purr of the big Turbo-diesel rev up in first and second under full load. Blowing out the cobwebs is good for the motor, burns out carbon deposits and regenerates the DPF.
Also I haven't driven yet (got a permit and am working on lisence as soon as I can find classes that fit my schedule), but I don't imagine the sense of freedom from driving is much different from an ebike or boat, both of which have varying requirements depending on where you live but ebikes generally don't require a lisence and neither do unpowered boats with some places allowing them under a certain HP/size and even the ones that do make it easier to get a boater's card then a driver's lisence.
And most agree everyone that speeds is a careless/reckless driver.
Im not dispelling what your trying to say, im simply saying speed does not exist without someone always being behind it and thus becomes the weak link to the argument.