I find Annoying when people complaint about 100fps and not getting 120fps

[Axiata]

bro.. people out there playing fps games with literal 40fps.. and i dont see them complaining
and these guys..

[Pocahawtness]

Axiata eredeti hozzászólása:

bro.. people out there playing fps games with literal 40fps.. and i dont see them complaining
and these guys..

It very much depends whether the high refresh bug has bitten you. For ages I would have agreed with you, until I bought a 144Hz monitor. Now, going below about 90Hz is really bad, lol.

I agree though that there is no real difference between 100Hz and 120Hz. 60Hz is something to complain about, lol, but 40Hz would be unplayable.

[Plaid]

There's probably an overpriced pill for that.

[agu]

big number better than small number

[Morkonan]

Axiata eredeti hozzászólása:

bro.. people out there playing fps games with literal 40fps.. and i dont see them complaining
and these guys..

I used to have to walk all the way uphill, in a blizzard, and back home, uphill, just to get 30fps...

Sure, big FPS numbers can be very nice. However, I'm pretty satisfied with mediocre FPS and pretty happy with 60fps in most games. There "could" be times in certain games that have certain mechanics where low FPS really matters, but... even then I may not care very much. Some games don't work well with high FPS, too, and need to be limited.

[isomorphic_projection]

crunchyfrog eredeti hozzászólása:

isomorphic_projection eredeti hozzászólása:

Good old fashion TV and movie theaters, run at 35 fps give or take. My screen does not get higher then 60, so i run at 60. The human eye can't even go beyond 60, it can but you don't see it conscious. Everything else still needs to be processed. Way after people stop playing. During their sleep.

Do bear in mind while that's generally true it ain't that simple as it doesnt occur in a vacuum.

The whole point of having tech that can run that fast means you get OTHER processing running equally quickly. So sure, you may not get more frames you can visibly notice, but you WILL get better rendering and other things that also smooth out.

Like fallout's 4, Achilles heel. Weapon debris.

[Samwise]

GageTheSpartan eredeti hozzászólása:

i can't even tell the difference between 30 and 60 frames half the time lmfao

On console maybe, on pc 30fps looks horrible due to uneven framepacing and smoothing techniques consoles have

[isomorphic_projection]

Samwise eredeti hozzászólása:

GageTheSpartan eredeti hozzászólása:

i can't even tell the difference between 30 and 60 frames half the time lmfao

On console maybe, on pc 30fps looks horrible due to uneven framepacing and smoothing techniques consoles have

No it isn't, it just means your screen doesn't give feedback.

[🍋 Lemonfed 🍋]

most of the time it's the fluctuation or drops in the framerates that is annoying.

if you're playing at 60 then it's drop at 50 for a few seconds you might something , same thing with 120 fps , I think that for some peoples it's might be noticeable if the game normaly run at 120 fps and suddenly it's drop at 100.

[isomorphic_projection]

I'll shall make this short. If we would, strip a game for every effect. And keep it as real as possible compared to the normal world. Then a fly would need to see the same as we do, but then at 12000fps.

[Q-T_3.14.exe]

I don't see what the problem is. I have played video games on a potato before.

[stoneyoda]

i see alot of people in here saying anything higher then 60 is is un-needed
and i will agree that 60 is playable,(even 30 is playable with good frame pacing)
100-144 is way better. even 75fps is alot better then 60
i used to be the guy who though 60 was perfect until i got a 144hz monitor and it totally changed my opinion, 100 is the sweet spot in terms of graphics and framerate
120-144 is better but not by that much. i feel like alot of people in this thread only have
60hz monitors and thats fine, but if you were to get a 144hz you'd see how much
better 100-144fps is. especially with g-sync/freesync

[DRUNK_CANADIAN]

30 fps and up is fine with me

[Devsman]

SinisterPiggy eredeti hozzászólása:

GageTheSpartan eredeti hozzászólása:

i can't even tell the difference between 30 and 60 frames half the time lmfao

I'm very convinced peoples eyesight has a lot to do with what framerate they can perceive. 30fps and 60fps is a MASSIVE difference to me, and 60-120fps is another huge difference (with the right monitor). Dips from 120 to 70 are super noticable to me and makes the game super slugish. I always thought 60fps was completely fine until i got a 144hz monitor, now I don't think I can even use a 60hz monitor again without it feeling laggy and slow.

It's not eyesight; it's psychology.

Specifically, persistence of vision.

[Azami]

I used to play CSGO with 200 FPS on low settings. 200 is my recommended, 100 is okay, 60 is decent. Anything below, kill me now.

[Yzal]

Pinky eredeti hozzászólása:

It's especially funny when people claim they can't play below 120fps, yet have a 60Hz monitor.

If you're used to playing at certain fps and then change them your muscle memory get's fecked, even if it's the same monitor.

My first pc could only do 30 fps in a game, but i still played it for years. When i got a better pc that could do 60+ no problem i found myself missing all my flick shots by little bits to the right or left.
Why? muscle memory. i got used to the timing of 33ms response time so after moving to 16,6ms i was either over or under shooting targets.