安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
We need a foundation of established language systems so we can communicate with each other. If language was nebulous and completely arbitrary, I'd never know what anyone is saying.
What does that have to do with justifying your suggestion? Because I don't see any particular reason why this is a good idea from you so far.
And referencing languages, I'd rather everyone speaks whatever language they want and then has it auto-translated on the fly by AI or whatever. As long as any language can connect and/or be interpreted according to some standard (that should TBH be created from scratch instead of being based on English or w/e), you should be fine. Or you just mix everything and have that mixture become a standard.
Overall, AI opens so many doors. Just think of a game (if you still play games by then) that takes place in Rome 2000 years ago. Why would you have it in English when everyone can effectively understand Latin simply by virtue of technological advances? And why would you speak one language in particular when sentiments such as specialization are alleged to be beneficial? Or a combination of multiple languages would be.
Alternatively, I could also look at blockchain, and the meta there is by some found in the presence of multiple systems with different specializations that can be combined by a means of unification. Then picking and combining different systems and their respective strengths given some context. (Although others don't want this and think one can rule all. But yeah... I think speaking English and enforcing a one-world government, at least for the time being, is pretty dystopian.)
maybe instead schools can teach students languages in actually engaging and practical ways...
and better language selection than ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ spanish, french, german, and chinese
Also, I wonder how many people in China knows enough english to be able to speak it semi decent?
EDIT: also, where on the keyboard should that symbol be?
That's what the French thought, too!
...and well, half of English vocabulary is French, anyway....
English is like the junk drawer of languages: there's bit and pieces of everything in there.
And actually a lot of Scandinavian and French..
Except it's a rather complicated symbol that is harder to make out in small fonts than the word "car".
...but otherwise... we actually already have.
Japan was using emoji before it was cool but now we have stuff like the car emoji, 🚗, which you can use to stick on your phone's calendar, which normally wouldn't have enough room to fit the whole word (especially with longer words), but can easily fit an emoji & now you can just look at your calendar, see the emojis, & know whatever it is, that you're using them to represent, is scheduled for that day ("Ahhh... today I need to get the car washed.")
This is one of the ways that emoji are actually superior to words & also a more universal language.
Preparing for the impending take-over attempt?