unpopular gaming opinions

[As shrimple as that]

i liked final fantasy 13

but i guess its because it was my first game

[☎need4naiim☎]

Though the 2003 game NFS Underground was very successful individually, it shifted the roots of NeedForSpeed franchise (which could be found in NFS, NFS2, NFS2 SE, NFSIII, NFS: High Stakes, NFS: Porsche Unleashed and NFSHP2 games) into a fast&furious style franchise. Though NFS 2010 tried something, it just couldn't revert it back to the roots. After 2002 game, the NFS:RUN was the most similar game to the 1994 one.

[Volfogg]

We don't need that many Pokemon games... We need Digimon World games' flaws fixed and more Digimon Story games. Also more true MegaTen games instead of Persona games.

[Tito Shivan]

Easy games are better.
All multiplayer games should include bots for single play.

[Devil`s Rejected]

Hentai games suck!

[🍋 Lemonfed 🍋]

Postat inițial de Tito Shivan:

Easy games are better.
All multiplayer games should include bots for single play.

I agree with the bots for single players , sometime it's just fun to mess around with bots and not playing seriously.

and well , I do think most games should include an easy mode. (including Dark souls which peoples seem to praise only for being a ''hard'' game rather then the gameplay itself)

[628]

Postat inițial de Tito Shivan:

Easy games are better.
All multiplayer games should include bots for single play.

The prob is every game is trying to get on e-sports craze. Casual multiplayer concert itself is dying of that. Remember the Smash Bros' original context? It was anti-tournament-fighter. It is now as severe as Street Fighter. Remember how Gran Turismo was? It was the games for doing stuff with road cars, not only GT grandprix worthy race cars. E-sports ruined everything.

[device]

Postat inițial de Tito Shivan:

Easy games are better.
All multiplayer games should include bots for single play.

YES! YES! YES! YES!

[Gus the Crocodile]

Postat inițial de Rage628:

Postat inițial de Tito Shivan:

Easy games are better.
All multiplayer games should include bots for single play.

The prob is every game is trying to get on e-sports craze. Casual multiplayer concert itself is dying of that. Remember the Smash Bros' original context? It was anti-tournament-fighter. It is now as severe as Street Fighter. Remember how Gran Turismo was? It was the games for doing stuff with road cars, not only GT grandprix worthy race cars. E-sports ruined everything.

That's not the problem there at all though. Multiplayer games not including bots has been normal forever. It's fine. There's no shortage of single-player games.

[Squingus]

Postat inițial de Tito Shivan:

Easy games are better.
All multiplayer games should include bots for single play.

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ agreed fully

[Squingus]

Postat inițial de Black Knight Satellite:

Hentai games suck!

literally

[628]

Postat inițial de Gus the Crocodile:

Multiplayer games not including bots has been normal forever. It's fine.

It's absolutely not. For example? Rocket League. The available options for players are two: against uncustomizable weak bots or super tryhards who are clearly not "enjoying match" but enjoying wins.

Postat inițial de Gus the Crocodile:

There's no shortage of single-player games.

Because there are a ♥♥♥♥ ton of open-hollow-world games doesn't mean everybody is satisfied with singleplayer games.

[628]

Speaking of open-world, open-world is just an excuse for hitting on nothing creative.

[Tito Shivan]

Postat inițial de Gus the Crocodile:

That's not the problem there at all though. Multiplayer games not including bots has been normal forever. It's fine. There's no shortage of single-player games.

That's like saying it's fine pizza not having pineapple because there's lots of meals with pineapple. But I do want to eat pizza with pineapple.

I want to play those multiplayer games But I don't need all the bells and whistles that surround online play. I want the choice. And I respect devs who give that choice to you.

I want to play CSGO without the toxicity, and without having to worry about penalties or screwing a match for other 9 people if I have to pull out because real life knocks at the door.

Just to give an example of why I value MP games having bots so much. I used to run a weekly LAN party with friends thanks to Battlefield 2 having bots. They were all casual people, who would have ditched the game had they been exposed to regular online play.
But the ability to fill a local BF2 server with cannonfodder (we werent' even enough people to fill a server) created a controlled enviroment in which we spent hundreds of hours of plain dumb fun.

We didn't need other gamers but we needed more players in game. Bots allowed that. And for a long time that's not been a possibility for so many games.

Of course I understand the industry reasons to stop adding bots to their games, but I don't put my money on games who don't show that deference to gamers.
I still have Valve in high steem because they still are one of those few who DO walk that extra mile to give you bots in their MP games. TF2m, CSGO, DOTA2, L4D2... Hell Even Artifact and Underlords had bot matches.

Also multiplayer games having bots serve to extend a game life. No one to play Quake 3 Arena? No prob. I'll jump in with some bots. I still can play UT by myself.

[Electric Cupcake]

Postat inițial de Tito Shivan:

Postat inițial de Gus the Crocodile:

That's not the problem there at all though. Multiplayer games not including bots has been normal forever. It's fine. There's no shortage of single-player games.

That's like saying it's fine pizza not having pineapple because there's lots of meals with pineapple. But I do want to eat pizza with pineapple.

I want to play those multiplayer games But I don't need all the bells and whistles that surround online play. I want the choice. And I respect devs who give that choice to you.

I want to play CSGO without the toxicity, and without having to worry about penalties or screwing a match for other 9 people if I have to pull out because real life knocks at the door.

Just to give an example of why I value MP games having bots so much. I used to run a weekly LAN party with friends thanks to Battlefield 2 having bots. They were all casual people, who would have ditched the game had they been exposed to regular online play.
But the ability to fill a local BF2 server with cannonfodder (we werent' even enough people to fill a server) created a controlled enviroment in which we spent hundreds of hours of plain dumb fun.

We didn't need other gamers but we needed more players in game. Bots allowed that. And for a long time that's not been a possibility for so many games.

Of course I understand the industry reasons to stop adding bots to their games, but I don't put my money on games who don't show that deference to gamers.
I still have Valve in high steem because they still are one of those few who DO walk that extra mile to give you bots in their MP games. TF2m, CSGO, DOTA2, L4D2... Hell Even Artifact and Underlords had bot matches.

Also multiplayer games having bots serve to extend a game life. No one to play Quake 3 Arena? No prob. I'll jump in with some bots. I still can play UT by myself.

And despite what some people say, bots can give an even harder challenge than human players. Especially when the AI lets them run backwards and shoot.

[Ⓥenom Ⓢnake 🐍]

The Rainbow 6 Vegas games have the fun terrorist hunt, which you can play mp, but if you just wanna run around and shoot baddiebots, totally fun.

There were a lot of great rpgs on the snes and genesis, but the best one by far is Phantasy Star 4 End of the Millennium. Followed by FFvi, then Phantasy Star 3.

The second best mario game on NES is Wrecking Crew. Fight me!

The psx was inferior to the 3dO graphics.

Nintendo needs to make a new Virtual Boy. As a self contained unit. I would kill for a vr metroid or kid icarus. Hell, give me a vr machrider. Post apocalypse motorcycle cycle combat.