安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
"Another example. The (made up) birthday for the reddit account believed to have belonged to Ghislaine Maxwell is March 12th, 2006. Well drop the 2000 and use 2 digit format. 03/12/06. 03/1+2/06. 03/03/06. 06/06, 66. then since digital roots are commutative, no matter how you do it you end up with 3 (6+6=12=1+2=3). If it was a one off deal you'd say okay, but it's like every single time. So this could be a signal that tells other people who are aware "ignore this stuff, interpret selectively" allowing communication without any special channels to disseminate it nor paper trail. Another example that comes to mind. Someone askled George Washington if he was a Freemason. He replied "why I haven't been to a lodge but once or twice in 30 years!" On the face of it, plausible... deniable. But then you look at it, once or twice = 1 and 2. 30 years. 1+2+30=33. What are the odds."
I could be misinterpreting what you're saying, but this seems a bit...out there for me. Why would people be using gematria as a means of encoded transmission when someone on Off-Topic could decode it with ease? I feel like there would be better ways.
I one time saw someone coming up with a bunch of conspiracy theories online, and the only thing he really based his theories on was gematria. I feel like doing that is looking to deep into things and finding something where there's really nothing. Like apophenia, confirmation bias, the sorts.
Again, I could be understanding you wrong.
Plausible deniability and lack of context probably, particularly if systems like this were simply carried forward from pre-internet and mass media information saturation where you know about all kinds of things people have said, and can just pull it up out of the historical record or google a birthday or whatever. A lot of people are born on March 12th, 2006. Or 12/12/2001, or 06/06/2004. But if you have it in context, or are in position where you have other information and pick up on other hints (which we may not know to look for), things will pop out and click in mind for the initiated. It reminds me of a European secret society called the "oculists". The initiation ritual was a mock surgery done on the eye (like Paul having the scales removed from his eyes), after which they were left in a dark room (iirc) and then taught a secret cipher. Symbolically given new eyes.
It's also possible they believe using these numbers has a function beyond human affairs, like an energetic signature or a lucky number, talisman, sigil, etc. That it's required to do so.
Lastly in many cases the information is either useless on its own to an individual (or another group / power), a limited hangout / not fully interpretable, or useless to the uninitiated even if they can identify its presence in some cases. Or, better yet, if you know that someone knows about and believes in a signature, you can misdirect and false flag. It's possible all kinds of things go on. that's the benefit of covert signalling in plain sight in a way that makes no meaningful papertrail and is disseminated in the open and through general channels. So someone just has to read the paper, watch the news, etc. Otherwise you'd need secure channels of communication and coordination between what could be relatively spread out and large groups, everyone on the same page, central control, papertrail and possibility of intercepting communications or having more potential witnesses to secret meetings, and connections, and so on. A lot of this still makes sense in the electronic age.
Yeah, it doesn't seem like a good idea to base anything solely on gematria. Unless there was a very clear pattern and you had some idea where it may be coming from.
The other thing that comes to mind is brainwashing, MKULTRA (though these methods of trying to break people into multiple personalities and program them go back to ancient Egypt) and so on. Some of these numbers and codes could simply go and be processed and then reoutput in other forms by alters in the subconscious. Like human computers. That sounds like a stretch however, and I don't imagine that would have been widespread initially beyond the Pharaohs and direct descendants of or those in proximity to ancient Egypt's upper power structure, priest class, etc.
thirty-nine buried,
zero found.
by the modern date his theoretical reign as tsar of a surviving tsardom of bulgaria, wouldve lasted roughly 79 years by 2022, or in other terms, 7 more years than louis XIV of france, who is the actual holder of longest reigning monarch.
"The numbers, Mason! What do they mean?!"
It's a bit interesting how the numbers of Jesus' name are related to astrology somehow. It's probably nothing, but it's kinda cool to imagine God hiding little details like that in things.