What do you think of afterlife?

[Anderson]

Do you think it just darkness and nothing else.

[ultrashizman]

Of course Friedrich Nietzsche was a nihilist. Have you ever heard the story about his marriage? He's the biggest cuck in philosophy.

[sabbathhank]

If you read Beyond Good and Evil, he is not really a nihilist I do not think.

[Grendalcat]

I don't think much of it.

[76561198278961361]

Ursprungligen skrivet av Shiznown:

Of course Friedrich Nietzsche was a nihilist. Have you ever heard the story about his marriage? He's the biggest cuck in philosophy.

Ok and?

[ultrashizman]

A lot of atheists are just the reverse of evangelicals. Funny enough they like to both preach about the same amount.

[ultrashizman]

Ursprungligen skrivet av stupid(t)=e^t:

Ursprungligen skrivet av Shiznown:

Of course Friedrich Nietzsche was a nihilist. Have you ever heard the story about his marriage? He's the biggest cuck in philosophy.

Ok and?

If a man isn't smart enough to leave a wife that denies him sex and only had sex with him one time in years, I sure as hell do not want to take his advise, or teachings.

[Dracoco OwO]

Ursprungligen skrivet av Shiznown:

A lot of atheists are just the reverse of evangelicals. Funny enough they like to both preach about the same amount.

I preach nothing aside my opinions and bad puns.

[ultrashizman]

Ursprungligen skrivet av Dracoco OwO:

Ursprungligen skrivet av Shiznown:

A lot of atheists are just the reverse of evangelicals. Funny enough they like to both preach about the same amount.

I preach nothing aside my opinions and bad puns.

Maybe, but the atheist "movement" is filled with such people. Take the Amazing Atheist for example. Also, most atheists tend to be far left. Evangelicals are far right. Both movements and there subgroups are hostile towards rights. Two sides of sh** sandwich.

[sabbathhank]

the Bible is mostly about believing in God, if you are not an atheist at all then that's basically all that the book is about and I think a lot of people probably do not realize this somehow. I am not the biggest fan of organized religion though for various reasons, I think they a groups used out of turn with the Bible and often just are used for some agenda or purpose out of alignment with the book to some extent. You see people focusing obsessively and slavishly to scripture, and it doesn't really offer any more meaningful or deeper understanding of the spiritual nature of things like I have experienced from others who were not overtly religious themselves but were not atheists.

It's ironically what Jesus found fault in with Judaism and the Jews, they were too focused on "jewish laws" and the scripture, where as now the Christians in my experience are the exact same way.

[ultrashizman]

Ursprungligen skrivet av sabbathhank:

the Bible is mostly about believing in God, if you are not an atheist at all then that's basically all that the book is about and I think a lot of people probably do not realize this somehow. I am not the biggest fan of organized religion though for various reasons, I think they a groups used out of turn with the Bible and often just are used for some agenda or purpose out of alignment with the book to some extent. You see people focusing obsessively and slavishly to scripture, and it doesn't really offer any more meaningful or deeper understanding of the spiritual nature of things like I have experienced from others who were not overtly religious themselves but were not atheists.

I'll clarify my previous statement further. There are "moderate" Christians that do not fall into the category I stated. Though with moderately religious people they tend to be more level headed. In my opinion a lot of atheists need a void to fill, so they worship a new religion, the state.

[sabbathhank]

Ursprungligen skrivet av Shiznown:

Ursprungligen skrivet av Dracoco OwO:

I preach nothing aside my opinions and bad puns.

Maybe, but the atheist "movement" is filled with such people. Take the Amazing Atheist for example. Also, most atheists tend to be far left. Evangelicals are far right. Both movements and there subgroups are hostile towards rights. Two sides of sh** sandwich.

I dunno in my experience it seems they are communists either way. I do not agree secularly with what falls for religion and Christianity all that regularly these days. I would hesitate to say it's far right or left in actuality so much as they are all "neo-liberals" in some way, which is basically like some weird mixture of politics. It's basically in support of unregulated capitalism, profit, whilst seemingly supporting outsourcing and mass immigration and also, I feel like somehow they manage to be quasi-communist as well. In general, everything available for voting on the political spectrum is pretty much just this dressed up in a different name. You could say what I described is "libertarianism" as well, what's the difference?

[ultrashizman]

Ursprungligen skrivet av sabbathhank:

Ursprungligen skrivet av Shiznown:

Maybe, but the atheist "movement" is filled with such people. Take the Amazing Atheist for example. Also, most atheists tend to be far left. Evangelicals are far right. Both movements and there subgroups are hostile towards rights. Two sides of sh** sandwich.

I dunno in my experience it seems they are communists either way. I do not agree secularly with what falls for religion and Christianity all that regularly these days. I would hesitate to say it's far right or left in actuality so much as they are all "neo-liberals" in some way, which is basically like some weird mixture of politics. It's basically in support of unregulated capitalism, profit, whilst seemingly supporting outsourcing and mass immigration and also, I feel like somehow they manage to be quasi-communist as well. In general, everything available for voting on the political spectrum is pretty much just this dressed up in a different name. You could say what I described is "libertarianism" as well, what's the difference?

My point was, there are subgroups in the two categories I talked about. With Atheism you tend to have neo-feminist movements, with Evangelicals, you have things like parent groups that get mad if little Timmy watching Cinemax at night because they're too stupid or lazy to prevent their kids from being exposed to adult things. Both sorts of groups are terrible. Also, I do believe in general a spiritual but not oppressive society is much better than an atheist one. When the majority of people are atheist, then you have a situation where the government, like with China, or North Korea where they basically make their own religion where people worship the state. This is why I believe some sort of spiritual belief is better in general than atheism, because the void caused by atheism can be more easily filled with state worship.

[76561198278961361]

Ursprungligen skrivet av Shiznown:

A lot of atheists are just the reverse of evangelicals. Funny enough they like to both preach about the same amount.

Except one group is trying to use some old book to claim all those who don't will burn in hell for eternity, and the other group is pointing out that's cruel and disproving it.
I am talking, of course, about the vocal members of either group.

Ursprungligen skrivet av Shiznown:

Ursprungligen skrivet av stupid(t)=e^t:

Ok and?

If a man isn't smart enough to leave a wife that denies him sex and only had sex with him one time in years, I sure as hell do not want to take his advise, or teachings.

That really doesn't say something about how true or false his opinions are regarding an afterlife or the existence of a god.

[☎need4naiim☎]

Ursprungligen skrivet av Shiznown:

.... then you have a situation where the government, like with China, or North Korea where they basically make their own religion where people worship the state. This is why I believe some sort of spiritual belief is better in general than atheism, because the void caused by atheism can be more easily filled with state worship.

[Dracoco OwO]

I'm actually socialist, maybe i don't label myself with political movements, but i believe in some of their value to some extent i suppose.