Would you rather be rich or famous

[Random Ryan (RETURNING SOON!)]

What’s your answer?

[Jej]

Neither. I prefer a modest, simple and peaceful life.

[Wisman]

If famous means leaving a legacy, easily that. If famous means being a celebrity, then no.

[Angel]

Rich; I value my privacy.

[WhiteKnight]

Escrito originalmente por Jej:

Neither. I prefer a modest, simple and peaceful life.

[BanOphobia My Struggle]

Escrito originalmente por WhiteKnight:

Escrito originalmente por Jej:

Neither. I prefer a modest, simple and peaceful life.

Yeah, but you just did a contradiction in terms. You White Knighted for JeJ and the comment they made, cuz you are THE White Knight.

[Radene]

Escrito originalmente por Wisman:

If famous means leaving a legacy, easily that. If famous means being a celebrity, then no.

Legacy is just comfort for men who fear death.

[BanOphobia My Struggle]

Escrito originalmente por Radene:

Escrito originalmente por Wisman:

If famous means leaving a legacy, easily that. If famous means being a celebrity, then no.

Legacy is just comfort for men who fear death.

Eh no

I want my G/kids to go on after my death. If they use my legacy or someone's else's I am fine with that.

[EvilPinata]

Escrito originalmente por ☎need4naiim☎:

Being famous in God's esteem.


All mortals will be dead anyway come the Reaper of Souls, so you won't be carrying over your wealth once you become dead enough. There is no way a mortal can shake off the Reaper. You can ask billions of dead if you can. Even the richest ones couldn't bribe Angel of Death. Scientists couldn't cancel it, nor Actors couldn't deceive it. Same procedure for the poor&rich.

I never understood why people say you can't bring your riches or possessions with you when you die. I'm sure we're all aware we can't carry over our wealth into whatever afterlife exists, but that's not the point. We don't need it for our death, we need it for our life. Having riches in the afterlife won't help me at all with the money problems I have right now, so not being able to take it with me doesn't matter.

[Radene]

Escrito originalmente por EvilPinata:

Escrito originalmente por ☎need4naiim☎:

Being famous in God's esteem.


All mortals will be dead anyway come the Reaper of Souls, so you won't be carrying over your wealth once you become dead enough. There is no way a mortal can shake off the Reaper. You can ask billions of dead if you can. Even the richest ones couldn't bribe Angel of Death. Scientists couldn't cancel it, nor Actors couldn't deceive it. Same procedure for the poor&rich.

I never understood why people say you can't bring your riches or possessions with you when you die. I'm sure we're all aware we can't carry over our wealth into whatever afterlife exists, but that's not the point. We don't need it for our death, we need it for our life. Having riches in the afterlife won't help me at all with the money problems I have right now, so not being able to take it with me doesn't matter.

Well, we're talking about people to whom wealth is something you just accumulate, rather than put to use.

[Blargo]

The one that doesn't involve people caring about every minor thing I do, like eating breakfast.

[saranacX]

Of course rich. Who'd wanna be famous nowadays?

[IcyGlare]

Being rich and unknown is ideal.

[Et tu, B?]

I don't want either choice though.

[agu]

Rich and unknown like the bank owners and other overlords

Escrito originalmente por Et tu, Vi?:

I don't want either choice though.

I'll take Vi's money too in that case :^)

[Radene]

Escrito originalmente por Dxpress:

The one that doesn't involve people caring about every minor thing I do, like eating breakfast.

They won't even get to breakfast, they'll get stuck at whether you poured milk or cereal first.