安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Even one full day of peace and nonviolence seems to be hard for humankind to achieve.
I talk mainly about the EU, you don't face exactly the same problems in America, Canada and Australia. The peoples aren't the same in your countries, you have more common points and a lot more protection against abuses. With efforts you can make it I think, because your divisions are mainly political ones. Not the same situation at all, but the EU is done, I don't bet a cent on the survival of the European Union.
If you can genuinely call it 'peace' with a straight face (because I can't), then yeah, it's just about over.
I prefer to think of it as the calm before the storm.
☔
This is why you should take some time to learn something about economics. So you can understand these things.
There is a hiccup on the way, we just don't know how powerful it'll be. Or more importantly, what will be affected.
Electronics market crashing (and it is semi-crashing now, with semiconductor crunch) isn't nearly as doomy as food&water going into short supply. And food has been getting more difficult to produce with the climate shifts.
Question is, how much more trouble we'll have.
In the end, wars are fought over resources, food often being paramount.