Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jtu1PI4Cvlg
I’m not necessarily for laugh tracks. But they do have their place. They serve a wider and more noble purpose than one might think at first.
There’re definitely bad shows. But I strongly disagree about Seinfeld in particular. Seinfeld is one of the greats and is proven funny without laugh tracks. Though it’s definitely possible to make people laugh or laugh more by simply laughing. Humor is a complex thing.
Many people do look for cues to get an okay to laugh signal. Taking out the cues they’re used to looking for doesn’t mean something isn’t funny. There’re many circumstances in life that people don’t laugh at while in the circumstances themselves. But then later realize it was really funny.
This is the essence of some of Seinfeld’s best humor, so a laugh track makes sense. Seinfeld has good characters, almost too good. Almost too relatable. It’s often about saying hey, what’s up with these things and these people, this stuff is actually really funny.
Like take “The Soup Nazi.” That situation isn’t funny in person. It’s pretty serious. If you don’t behave right, you’re not getting soup. If you’re actually in that situation, you’re not going to laugh, because you want the delicious soup. And so, when you’re watching it and relating to the characters you’re not going to want them to mess up and miss out on the soup.
The laugh track tells you, hey you’re not actually one of these characters experiencing this right now. It’s okay for you to laugh at this absurd situation in the moment instead of waiting until later. You’re not going to be punished for laughing right now. It’s like adding salt or sugar to food to bring out the flavor because your tongue needs an exaggerated cue to notice the full flavor.
Behavior cues aren’t even exclusive to humor.
Those YouTube no laugh track things are really no different in essence than laugh tracks. They’re telling viewers how to behave/think about the content they’re controlling for you to see. It’s enabling haters to hate something they want to hate at, the same way a laugh track enables someone who wants to laugh at something.
You’re going in with the expectation that it’s going to be less funny. Like no, it just doesn’t have as many laugh cues. When you take those out, some parts of a show like Seinfeld may become too relatable for those of a certain mind frame to laugh. Plus, they’re part of the show.
It’s almost like removing one of the characters. The show would likely be done very different if they went in knowing there wouldn’t be laugh tracks.
And remember, laugh tracks are common. But shows as popular as Seinfeld aren’t. So it’s probably more than just the laugh track that people find funny.
I do think over-reliance on laugh tracks can be an issue though, just like over-reliance on sudden loud sounds for jump scares in horror, or salt and sugar with food.
But I don’t think it’s fair to dismiss a show by the removal of one of it’s components.
It should be weighed based on what it has. Some things, some people just really need salt on to taste. Other things are made almost entirely of salt.
Seinfeld is not made of laugh tracks. It merely uses them for cues.
This becomes painfully obvious when he leaves the show after season 7.