安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
I would leave the girl I feel but I feel I would not leave the kid. The kid did nothing wrong to me.
As for getting married I would if it was the only way me and a girl could spend are life's together.
Look, it's not black and white. From the husband's point of view, biologically, not my child. Emotionally and all that jazz - yes. It's a really bad situation, you look at your child, love and hate is all jumbled up. The child that provided free joy to you in the past. You all heard stories of how fathers will lay their lives down for their children.
From the wife's point of view, if she gave up a career to be the primary child carer at that time, a choice that both husband and wife took together (though under the illusion of the child being biological his) she need some time to get back to financial independence. Or maybe she was an abused wife.
From the child's point of view, I didn't ask to be born. And now I have no home or food. I don;t know Finnish law, but I am guessing they made the decision for the child's sake.
The way a story is framed can impact our impression. I don't have the details of this case but likely this is not about men's right, it's about protecting a defenseless child. I figure the next step is to find the biological father then have him take over the child support.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/more-women-are-paying-alimonythat-includes-supporting-their-exs-porn-habit-2018-05-23
The district court ruled in its judgment that the maintenance obligation is the child’s right.
It's about the child, not the parents.
The legal system is not fair, they feel the citizens should pay for EVERYTHING! Even if it's not their mess.
Two sides to every story. The government doesn't want to pay for it even though they don't mind collecting taxes from everyone. They would rather use their hair-splitting discriminatory bombastic ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ policies to ♥♥♥♥ someone else into paying for it. She made a mistake he made a mistake when he got involved with her. Why should he get ♥♥♥♥♥♥ for both her as well as his mistake?
Yeah, it's all bombastic ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. The legal system is the FUBU of weasels. ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ rewarding ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ for being ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.
Seems pretty sketchy to me, warrants an immediate divorce. I'd keep the kid in my life if the actual dad wanted nothing to do with it though.
But, buttom line is that court rulings like this will only drive the percentage of the unmarried population high because of dumb court decisions. Mark my word.
Answer me this. How would you feel if you were in that same position yourself? You wouldn't sound so apathetic right now, would you?
As for your question: i'm not apathetic. i'm glad the court could see past all the melodrama of the man&woman and focus on the child's welfare. the child was born in 2014, so s/he is only 6 years old!!
the formation of deep bonds since you never know who is trustworthy and who isn't.
I have the compromise. Let him kick her face a few times so she at least walks away humiliated with some scars and he feels some satisfaction, she could pay the dental bill. that would be fair. She could pay the dental bill.
What about all of their rights? If the court cares so much about the child's welfare then they take care of it. It's easy for them to play hero when their decision doesn't impact them, it's someone else.
As for getting a divorce over an affair? I don't know, if the women is attractive I assume she's promiscuous, especially if she's a flirt.
You see those really attractive flirty women with those guys that think his log ride is the only she's taken and going on. Riiiiightttt ... *rolls eyes* Okay.