Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
Besides that, people often can't take any criticism. I often get called condescending or rude when I call lazy people lazy, e.g. when they start a new thread about something while there already are multiple ones about the same topic on the toppage of the forum, or if the problem could be fixed with just one minute of research.
As mentioned previously, you're probably just viewing it from a biased standpoint and viewing it with misinterpretation from over analyzing the simplicity of the comments and taking them too personally.
You're very defensive towards how I word your choice of words even known I'm expressing it in your originally unedited point-of-view, how you're acting and how even known you didn't directly say "everyone" in your post, your OP does greatly suggests that you're talking to a general overall audience and as well, this in itself addresses everyone as you've told everyone to "chill out".
You're trying to seek justification within on an irrelevant subject, I think you're trying to save your own skin to justify your original post, you must look inwards towards yourself and admit to yourself that you need to toughen up and admit that you've been deeply offended by a common internet occurrence that happens to everyone and that maybe you need to roughen up a little or leave for your own good.
This is when you especially isolate yourself from your readers, this is the internet and here text from verbal communication can be misinterpreted or taken too personally.
You're going to have disagreements & arguments as you would anywhere on the internet,
and maybe even a swear word is involved but you need to learn that people are not going to "chill out for a second" because you've taken deep personal offence towards a comment or that you've been too picky & overanalyzed a comment from its original expression of meaning.
I'll repeat again; you need to toughen up or leave for your own good because in a place of open discussion such disagreements or negative opinions will & may frequently happen and you need to come to terms with that, you can't have this inferiority complex because people will prey upon you for that if you act this soft & offended over some online comments.
Also, did anyone learn anything from this? I appreciate how controlled and civil this exchange was, but did anyone gain something from it?
It gave me amusement. Does that count?
So you want to have a condescending topic of why people are condescending ( according to you )
Like... like... like... that all your opinion and stuff man... like... like..
That is incorrect.
Not according to me - according to users like these:
https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/12/3006676913257705106/#c3006676913257723264
https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/12/2974027717619311156/#c2974027717619375016
https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/search/?gidforum=882959061469934084&include_deleted=1&q=condescending&p=2
...not me.
The topic is about pondering about why other people think this & make the claim.
Plenty of people actually read the OP & understood this on page one.
Perhaps you just misread / misunderstood.
You write much but you fail to read, man:
Only mention of hate in the OP is people seeing hate, not being hateful. There's a difference. If you don't know what it [that difference] is, then I have no interest in discussing this subject matter further with you.
There's no point in making counter-arguments against, or discussing one's reasoning with, someone who wants to claim that someone ( I ) said something that someone ( I ) didn't say.
⠀⠀⠀⠀
He did apologize.
That's the truth of it...
It wasn't even really offensive, more-so just confusing as to why that was his perspective in the first place, from my perspective. ( I know you said that it actually was snarky but snarky is different than being condescending. )
His apology doesn't explain any reasoning for why he jumped to that conclusion (& he's not the only one who has done this), hence this topic for discussing what [thought process] might cause (not only him but also) people in general to jump to that conclusion.
I wasn't going to bring up the links but people seem to think that someone said this [, according to them,] to me, personally, and I was somehow [, according to them,] offended - when really after reading enough posts like that one, it inspired a deep curiosity in me that I thought would make an interesting point of discussion.
The links are simply relevant to full disclosure & explanation of my own reasoning (which some people aren't going to believe but hey... that's fine. I hear the fortune-telling & mind-reading businesses are really revolutionizing society (not).)
That post, in particular, is, indeed, the one that inspired this topic, though. By then I'd read this in several topics (such as the other one I linked).
⠀⠀⠀⠀
We all now come to a mutual agreement, yes?