This live action tom and jerry will bomb.

[↑↑↓↓←→←→BASelect]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kP9TfCWaQT4

I give it a 3.5 out of 10.

What do you guys think?

[Ⓥenom Ⓢnake 🐍]

davidb11님이 먼저 게시:

Well, I'm not Optimistic, but if this is what we need to eventually get Speedy Gonzales, the Fastest Mouse in All of Mexico to come back, I'm all for it. :P

https://youtu.be/wYi_hq2p1Ac

[Your_White_Knight]

davidb11님이 먼저 게시:

Can we also not be silly and claim an actor can't save a movie. That's literally silly to claim.
There were plenty of movies saved by the actors in them.

Name one... I'll wait...

An actor / actress can't "save" a movie... like I said, you can't call garbage ice cream because you put chocolate sprinkles on top... many, many, many awesome actors / actresses are in unsavable movies.

[Marcawn]

Why do I have a bad feeling this will end up like Cats (2019) and other live action movies like Lion King?

[𝕎𝔸𝕃𝕋𝔼ℝ]

A̸̙̪͆r̵̟̫̀̿͐͜c̸̑͠님이 먼저 게시:

Why do I have a bad feeling this will end up like Cats (2019) and other live action movies like Lion King?

It's already doing much better than Cats just with the trailer.

[Hamster]

Dis look epic

[↑↑↓↓←→←→BASelect]

Ⓥenom Ⓢnake 🐍님이 먼저 게시:

davidb11님이 먼저 게시:

Well, I'm not Optimistic, but if this is what we need to eventually get Speedy Gonzales, the Fastest Mouse in All of Mexico to come back, I'm all for it. :P

https://youtu.be/wYi_hq2p1Ac

Speedy was pushing drugs on kids. Yes i know these cartoons was meant for adults originally. But they could of edited it out when showing it to kids.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7w1PTCdOM5Q

[↑↑↓↓←→←→BASelect]

davidb11님이 먼저 게시:

Your_White_Knight님이 먼저 게시:

Name one... I'll wait...

An actor / actress can't "save" a movie... like I said, you can't call garbage ice cream because you put chocolate sprinkles on top... many, many, many awesome actors / actresses are in unsavable movies.

Nice meme.
I'm not going to answer someone who is so set in stone in their ways they wouldn't budge if someone threw the moon at them. :P

But regardless of you being too set in your ways, movies are subjective.
Someone could find a way to claim Laurence of Arabia is a bad movie.
Or Avengers: Endgame.
OR etc,etc,etc. Need I go on?

The trailer for end game made me not want to watch it. I also thought that kiss ass move looked garbage. So again never watched it.

[Gus the Crocodile]

Guys it’s okay to not want to watch a movie for eight year olds.

[Your_White_Knight]

davidb11님이 먼저 게시:

Your_White_Knight님이 먼저 게시:

Name one... I'll wait...

An actor / actress can't "save" a movie... like I said, you can't call garbage ice cream because you put chocolate sprinkles on top... many, many, many awesome actors / actresses are in unsavable movies.

Nice meme.
I'm not going to answer someone who is so set in stone in their ways they wouldn't budge if someone threw the moon at them. :P

But regardless of you being too set in your ways, movies are subjective.
Someone could find a way to claim Laurence of Arabia is a bad movie.
Or Avengers: Endgame.
OR etc,etc,etc. Need I go on?

So you don't have an answer... got it.

See the problem with just saying "yes there is" is that eventually you have to actually prove it rather then just willing it to be because "I say so"... even small kids get that eventually... or more to the point, less and less are and they grow up thinking "because I say so" is the same as reality.

As for your "subjective" stance... I can assure you that where as you yourself can name Laurence of Arabia... nobody will in 58 years speak the same way about Avengers: Endgame... and I would feel safe to put money on that...

Need I go on? ;)

[AustrAlien2010]

Okay. I watched it. It looks well made. Family friendly; like a hybrid between a cartoon and a movie with real actors, taking place in a realistic modern world. Visually, this reminds me of Mary Poppins, or Who Framed Roger Rabbit. Something similar to that.
I could not have done it any better myself.

I probably still prefer the originals, though. Where you could only see the legs of the people. That was sort of a hallmark aspect, from the originals, if I remember correct, that I found funny.
That seems to be missing here. Here you can actually see the people their faces, instead of just their legs and feet. Or maybe I am confusing this with something else?

[Your_White_Knight]

*sigh*... you're waffling now... try to focus please...

davidb11님이 먼저 게시:

You'd be wrong to bet that.
But there's plenty of evidence of movies being saved by actors on Youtube and other websites.

Again... name them... I'm still waiting for anything more then "yes there is"

davidb11님이 먼저 게시:

The burden of proof is on you, by the way, not me. :P
Since you're the one directly contradicting everything everyone knows about movies and how the bad ones have been saved at times. :P

You came up with "actors can save movies" not me... and then couldn't name any but "yes there is".. the burden of proof is on you because you said they could to my they can't... trying to shift blame isn't an answer... it's just a dodge because you know you can't prove otherwise.

davidb11님이 먼저 게시:

I can also bet you $10,000 that people will remember Avengers: Endgame long after they forget about Laurence of Arabia.

"People"? Ok. name them... lol.. just kidding.

I rather doubt it at all... in fact there are more people alive today that can even name movies made in the 80's and 90's rather then in the 2000's... despite what Hollywood award shows want people to believe...

davidb11님이 먼저 게시:

So, do provide evidence that no one can save a bad movie.

Again... repeating your "NO, YOU!" is just playing word games... I'll tell you one when you tell me one that dose... and I'm still waitng.

davidb11님이 먼저 게시:

Birdemic is a terrible movie.
Cats is a terrible movie.

LMAO... you just proved me right and admitted you were wrong... agree.. Cats is a terrible movie..

Awesome musical by Andrew Lloyd Webber, Tony Award winning in fact... great director: Tom Hooper, great screenplay writers Lee Hall and Hooper, Budget $80–100 million so it had TONS of money put into it... and yet... and yet.. James Corden, Judi Dench, Jason Derulo, Idris Elba, Jennifer Hudson, Ian McKellen, Taylor Swift, Rebel Wilson, and Francesca Hayward...

could

not

save

it.

Thank you.. now, was that so hard to admit to?

davidb11님이 먼저 게시:

Also, change your name to "Your_Black_Knight." Because you are no white knight at all.
You're the complete opposite.

Oh dear.. here we go.. can't win so start name calling and attacking the person that doesn't agree with you... how sad.

A name is a name... if your idea of what it means isn't up to your standard then it's "wrong"? Just shows how shallow and empty you are...

davidb11님이 먼저 게시:

No one says Ghostbusters is a bad movie though. :P
The original one. And the sequel was good too.

The original was great.. and yes, no one says it's a bad movie ~because it's a good movie~ People say it's a good movie because it is... I don't understand why that's so hard to comprehend.

davidb11님이 먼저 게시:

We don't talk about the Ghostbusters movie from a few years ago.
At least Chris Hemsworth made it hilarious to watch.

It might of been "hilarious to watch" but him being in it saved the movie?... no.. and you agree the actor didn't "save the movie" but all you can say is "we don't talk about ( it )" which again says more then it doesn't that you agree but refuse to admit you're wrong because: "I'm right even when I'm wrong"

Not to mention... the reason people like the old Ghostbusters is because everything about it was good... not just the actors... and the reverse is true too... the actresses in the movie couldn't save the new Gostbusters movie alone even tough the original ones were in the movie because the rest of it was garbage and.. wait for it... wait for it... actresses no matter how "funny" ( if people say so, meh ) couldn't save a poor script, weak effects, recycled plot... ect. it takes an ENTIRE movie to make a good movie...

Now ( help me I'm textwalling again *sigh* )

"Bad" movies can be "good" movies... say... Plan 9 From Outer Space... but that's a niche movie genre that doesn't actually take itself seriously or try to claim itself as "good" even when it's not... that falls more into a "freudenschade" definition because it's so bad it's entertaining...

Oh well... goodbye troll... it was fun while it lasted but you now twice agreed with me even if you won't admit it... and that's good enough for me.

[Angel]

I just like the old school cat and mouse slapstick that we can't find on TV anymore due to overprotective millennial parents. I don't even think Looney Tunes is on anymore!

And I love this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1JKd1C7izQ

[s w e k]

Fred Durst님이 먼저 게시:

I never knew people were so passionate about Tom and Jerry.

it's so stupid