安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
True, but now they can (possibly) know why they feel inadequate in themselves and start to take control of their lives and begin to develop the sense of confidence which their parents could have failed to instill into them--parental failure isn't always the case for one's feeling of inadequacy, the lack of confidence.
It's hard to repair something when you don't know why you think or behave in such a way. Mature adults can learn to love and nurture themselves, something that wasn't given to them at a young age.
Hey, I too, am working towards of becoming a medical doctor. I suppose you want to become a psychiatrist?
No one knows exactly who they, themselves, are.
You might know enough about yourself to think that you do but not enough that you realize you actually don't.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadow_(psychology)
Another example, which kind of refers to the same thing from a different perspective, is the Johari Window :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johari_window#The_four_quadrants
The author of the textbook in my humanities class, suggested that upon much self-reflection, one can determine how much of their mind falls into each of the four categories (all 4 of them), & work towards bringing them into the "Open" & "Facade" areas (the latter being for stuff you'd rather keep private).
This argument is demonstrably false, through some simple logic that my professor pointed out, though... if neither you nor others know what is in the unknown quadrant of your mind (this if statement is true, every time for everyone, btw) then you have no way of actually measuring how much more self there is, that is unknown to both others & yourself.
It could be quite a lot, or it could be just a little bit - but considering that no one is currently knowledgeable enough to understand the architecture & coding of their own minds or DNA
...[as a result / consequently] I will always confidently place my estimate on "it's probably quite a lot - at least more than anyone realizes or cares to admit to themselves".
Nobody is smart, including the people who are confident enough to say that they are.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=glnqzfPNEzM
People who cast doubt aren't usually intending to bully - in fact, actual bullies tend to just violate boundaries & cause harm.
Most people who cast doubt, are challenging you to make your points stronger, or your plans better.
If someone tells you that something is not going to work, something that you are planning on doing, whether or not they suggest why - that is just their opinion, however, it is not a baseless opinion (though, it may appear so if they did not explain their reasoning); ...and if your plan actually fails, are you still going to look back upon that person & think, "That person was bullying me to doubt myself?" ...the fact of the matter is... they were right.
In that type of scenario, in that moment that they told you that you were wrong or your way was not going to work, you should have doubted yourself - even if the end result was that (even if they provided advice) you have sound reasoning for your plan & no reason to trust this person; you should have doubted yourself when a potentially well-meaning dissenter said, "this isn't going to work".
This is definitively true in a scenario where the planned choices actually didn't work. Whether one took any time to re-evaluate before moving forward or simply ignored what they were told, instead, is a defining factor between confidence & arrogance. You're not arrogant if you fail but you are arrogant if you fail after ignoring advice that you didn't even bother to consider after receiving. - In fact, even one who succeeds is arrogant if they don't consider any alternative points (in the event that they actually had time to consider such points)
...they just got lucky this time.
I'm not a psychology major; however, I, am a bit familiar with the aspect of human development and am a firm believer in the staged based theory, so you won't find any objections from me!
Yeah huh? As much as the observation that tree leaves are green right? lol.
True, of course anything green around my neighborhood generally gets smoked by the neighbors... so Steam OT forums is a lil step up.