Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
#1. What you're referring to now, isn't words, &
#2. That's still not an attack
...but by all means, please visit an urgent-care facility and tell them about how you need medical treatment because someone said some things to you online and / or reported some posts that some moderators issued a warning or reprimand on.
Make sure to point to which part of your body is damaged or in pain because of this.
Alternatively, try hiring a civil suit attorney about the civil rights violations or inability to be employed that you suffered as a result of this. I know that there's still a lot of pettifoggers in the world, so I believe you stand a decent enough chance of finding an attorney who will take this case for you.
Ah yes... you won't be hired anywhere because of this. /s
#1. That's not cancel culture, &
#2. Do you not realize that by making the claim that words are supposedly an attack - that words are violent - that you are advocating for one of the very perspectives that makes actual cancel culture possible?
...in addition to avocating for people to take violent actions "in self defense" over some WORDS.
The whole first 2 minutes of this clip perfectly portrays what I'm talking about, & sadly, real people, who are not sci-fi androids / gynoids, respond this way too :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAet6U-7Sms
1:05 - 1:20 is the most important part, also 1:44 - 2:00
"I don't like most of what you say. I try to resist the urge to shove you through a wall."
...but you know... if words are going to be accepted as an attack then... this won't be something that is just done by a robot in a sci-fi TV show - it will be the way that ordinary people conduct themselves, all of the time.
By the way, do you think that robots will eat meat? We are meat after-all, and it technically won't be cannibalism...
The values that we hold as a species, we will be passing on to our greatest creation... (and, perhaps, our final creation)
If anything, it makes me want to eat more meat because PETA are just a group of douchebags and dildos, making me look at vegans and veggietarians with contempt because of a select group
PETA is obviously not indicative of all vegans, the world, over, though.
However, anyone who subscribes to the claims of PETA, without any criticisms of the organization, are undoubtedly being led astray, down a path of false information & discriminatory hatred.
Is that supposed to be an insult,
I would be honored to be one of those.
I'm not a fan of PETA, they've been pretty dishonest about many things, however, it would be good if you could come up with better descriptors of what your issues are with them or at least improved insults that actually sound like insults.
Autistic people (& disabled people in-general) should not just be "collateral damage".
Regardless of whatever their condition is, they're still people.
If PETA were really "for the ethical treatment of animals" - if that was something that they actually cared about - then they would care about the ethical treatment of the most disadvantaged of humans too - humans are animals as well.
2. what does autism have to do with PETA?
3. humans are not animals.
- your other claims, that PETA does nothing good..etc, is hyperbole.
- i won't discuss law/crime here since it isnt relevant
pretty much the same as everywhere, yet vegans are the toxic "insane" ones.
Literally something that they published on their own website at one point, which was playing on fears of having or developing an autistic child rather than sticking to reasoned arguments against milk .
Pretty easy to find, although, the original page that they published it to has been edited sometime JUST this year (2021), but this certainly isn't their only instance of such a behavior - it's just the one that I both learned about & remember best :
https://www.google.com/search?q=PETA+autism+article+web+archive
http://web.archive.org/web/20151024191031/https://www.peta.org/features/got-autism-learn-link-dairy-products-disease/
This page was still up, with only a few minor edits, as late as January of 2021, btw.
http://web.archive.org/web/20210105223423/https://www.peta.org/features/got-autism-learn-link-dairy-products-disease/
But, you know... they, now, claim that it was "long since removed", despite the fact that it was only retracted early this year & remained in their publication for well over 6 years.
https://www.google.com/search?q=which+taxonomy+do+humans+belong+to
If they're not animals then what are they? Plants, Fungi, Bacteria, Viruses... something else?
or 4 years old