Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
Vatican, we have a problem.
Can we have an applause, please?
That's funny because 666 is in the Bible, and the Pope is in the Vatican, and he's making a reference to Apollo 13.
God, you're so hilarious. I am almost pissing myself here. You're a talented comedian!
What's so funny about that? Dude said he was so smart that he was able to distribute his IQ and animate six hundred and sixty six corn tortillas who became his disciples.
Those logical-mathematical test and there is a lot of different ones, only showcase one dimension of yourself.. You might be super brilliant at those and score high, only to have a super low interpersonal intelligence...
All in all.. don´t think about it and tbh... most people can´t even agree on what intelligence actually is or define it... in my opinion it is highly problematic, that we focus so much on the logical-mathematical one (and I score pretty good in those, so I am not biased against it) so much and neclect looking on what is the most important..
That is.. what you are good at.. what is your strengts ? what makes you unique.. With all that being said, I can tell you one thing, that I have "learned" from my semi long life... that is that being a intellectual person, prone to metacognition is hard on yourself and tbh.. will make you feel like an outsider.. its a burden, more so than a gift.. (atleast from my perspective)
I have many friends and family members, that don´t do this and they seem to follow a certain rhythm and pattern in their life, they don´t over think stuff, they just try to be "happy"
Maybe you should look at yourself as being lucky ?
I disagree with that statement.
But if you look at my post, you will understand why some people might think people are "odd" or have "mental issues" compared to themselves.. I once asked my sister what life is... she quickly glaced her two kids playing in the living room and then said.. "did you know mom bought a present for your son"
I hope you get point here..
Naw, you're thinking of an idiot savant; in order to get a PhD or a doctorate you gotta be able to ace all your undergraduate courses and beyond.
So many people have missed my previous quotation on what intelligence is and it is mental agility. A wise person (knowledgeable) isn't necessarily an intelligence person; they can simply learn very SLOWLY, perhaps even take decades to learn how to perform very simple simple task through trial and error.
"According to Mensa, the organization for the world's most intelligent people, which only allows members to join if they pass a difficult test: "IQ or Intelligence Quotient is an attempt to measure intelligence. This means many things to many people but generally the attribute of intelligence refers to quickness of mental comprehension (or mental agility).
"Intelligence is often confused with knowledge, wisdom, memory, or other attributes and in general has a variety of meanings depending on the context in which it is used. The term IQ usually refers to the attempt to measure a person's mental agility."
The problem is, that we would have to disagree on what they see learning is.. Mensa is not the only definion setter out there and most I know, would agree that the logical-mathematical only persuit mensa does is not just silly but harmful.
You don´t give a person a guitar in the mensa test and ask them to play a song or even to be able to listen to the tones... you also don´t ask them questions in relation to interpersonal issues...
I however agree that you can´t equal knowledge with intelligence, nor could you add learning in the same process either..
That is one take on it, but the problem here is that the "test" is done in an enviroment that caters to people that are good with the logical-mathematical sphere.. there is nothing outside of that and thus it becomes much to narrow as a pinpoint for what intelligence is.. unless you want to argue that it the only form to derive intelligence.
What about people that are blind? deaf? or without hands... do they then just go as "dumb as a chicken" category, because they would be if you used the same base line testing on them, as someone that excels at noting down logical-mathematical test on a piece of paper.
Again, the debate here is more about the definion and if you believe there to be only one narrow type of intelligence or if you think there is a larger spectrum with many different spheres..
Don`t worry, my sarcasm detector is not as rusty as my jokes. ;-)
If it was, then fear not
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZ73Q4DwrGM
What is the key point here? It's not focused on any subject of learning such as math or language; it's all about mental agility.