what is the worst kind of anime fan?

[snowcloudshinobi]

imo it's the "ironic" fans who proclaim to the world how trashy their taste in anime is and still think jojo references are funny in the current year.

[ṼṏẌṏḭḊ]

Dude, that is ♥♥♥♥♥♥ up.

[saranacX]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Gold Coin:

Diposting pertama kali oleh Dexious Emera:

what

If they just live in their fantasy.

o_O

[Silverkite]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Maze:

Diposting pertama kali oleh :(:

Anime fans who think that lolis is ok and not pedophilia because "she is a galactic space dragon cyborg witch thats 200000 years old, she just looks like she is 10".

Mate, not every anime that has a "loli" in it is sexualizing said loli. Saying that the mere presence of a child character in anime is pedophilia is like saying the presence of a child in traditional western media is child molestation. A loli is a child (or child like) character, the problem occurs when that character is subsequently sexualized.

Regardless, internet is the wrong place to argue morals. You can't claim "Child harm" on a non-existent character, which devolves the argument into one of superficial morals. Is it creepy to want to see lolis in that way? I'd have to say yeah, obviously it is. Regardless, it's none of my business.

You wanna see something super ♥♥♥♥♥♥ up, go look up Cuties. Those are real children being abused for profit. Can't believe that ♥♥♥♥ hasn't been canceled.

He's problably from Commieformia, Commada or Commistraulia

[Doctor Go-Go]

Those type they wander about with hair slicked straight about gasping and shouting as if they are in Dragon Ball Z. "HUH! O_O WHA?! O_O WAAAAAHHHHH! O_O AHHHHHHHH!"

[Bleurei]

All of them, and most importantly, MAL users.

[Naedmi]

Probably the purists that make it into a religion, want to become Japanese and see it as otherworldly that people can enjoy dubbed anime.

[Doctor Go-Go]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Explosion Hugger:

Probably the purists that make it into a religion, want to become Japanese and see it as otherworldly that people can enjoy dubbed anime.

Do these people exist, it seems more like autism.

[Observer]

Well the one who think Japan is the greatest place to live wihtout knowing that it isnt.

[Lebhleb]

Diposting pertama kali oleh GloriousWereTheDays:

Well the one who think Japan is the greatest place to live wihtout knowing that it isnt.

Seriously is some of that satire? Watched only that podcast by 3 Anime youtubers, honestly it sounds just awful if you aren't japanese.

[Doctor Go-Go]

I like guns and blowing things up therefore I couldn't live anywhere other than the U.S, I would have to leave all of the wonderful toys here. YES, guns are toys to me, NOT weapons.

[snowcloudshinobi]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Lebhleb:

Diposting pertama kali oleh GloriousWereTheDays:

Well the one who think Japan is the greatest place to live wihtout knowing that it isnt.

Seriously is some of that satire? Watched only that podcast by 3 Anime youtubers, honestly it sounds just awful if you aren't japanese.

it is. i'd only go to japan as a tourist. that said, japan is still a really beautiful country even if it isn't a flawless paradise. i'm mostly interested in their language, because then i can consume their media without relying on 3rd party translations. and i looove language so it doesn't feel like a waste to learn japanese just for anime/manga.

[Rasputin]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Mythical:

Diposting pertama kali oleh :(:

Anime fans who think that lolis is ok and not pedophilia because "she is a galactic space dragon cyborg witch thats 200000 years old, she just looks like she is 10".

Mate, not every anime that has a "loli" in it is sexualizing said loli. Saying that the mere presence of a child character in anime is pedophilia is like saying the presence of a child in traditional western media is child molestation. A loli is a child (or child like) character, the problem occurs when that character is subsequently sexualized.

Regardless, internet is the wrong place to argue morals. You can't claim "Child harm" on a non-existent character, which devolves the argument into one of superficial morals. Is it creepy to want to see lolis in that way? I'd have to say yeah, obviously it is. Regardless, it's none of my business.

You wanna see something super ♥♥♥♥♥♥ up, go look up Cuties. Those are real children being abused for profit. Can't believe that ♥♥♥♥ hasn't been canceled.

♥♥♥♥ ALERT

CHECK THE HARD DRIVES

[pepsi-cola]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Rasputin:

Diposting pertama kali oleh Mythical:

Mate, not every anime that has a "loli" in it is sexualizing said loli. Saying that the mere presence of a child character in anime is pedophilia is like saying the presence of a child in traditional western media is child molestation. A loli is a child (or child like) character, the problem occurs when that character is subsequently sexualized.

Regardless, internet is the wrong place to argue morals. You can't claim "Child harm" on a non-existent character, which devolves the argument into one of superficial morals. Is it creepy to want to see lolis in that way? I'd have to say yeah, obviously it is. Regardless, it's none of my business.

You wanna see something super ♥♥♥♥♥♥ up, go look up Cuties. Those are real children being abused for profit. Can't believe that ♥♥♥♥ hasn't been canceled.

♥♥♥♥ ALERT

CHECK THE HARD DRIVES

dude this is a 4 year old thread

[Lime]

someone was feeling guilty...

[76561199518540882]

This thread was quite old before the recent post, so we're locking it to prevent confusion.