Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
If people love watching only one or two animes for their entire lifetime, then that might be fine, but while I find it sad sometimes to say goodbye to some everything good must eventually end, and better after 24 episodes than after 500 if you ask me.
The longest anime I have willingly seen in recent times that wasn't some stupid Shonen adventure "friendship hurray let's travel around the world and fight a bazillion baddies along the way"anime was Eureka Seven (50 episodes), and even that didn't have that many as compared to other shows, and none of these felt like fillers to me.
i feel that
right on the money you are.
i mean, i like moe and cute girls doing cute things, but i can also enjoy a classic like ghost in the shell. i disagree that it has "devolved" as much as i love the animation japan released before their economic bubble popped.
1,000% agree
i remember watching naruto on crunchyroll (didn't have satellite tv back when it was popular) and i could tell which ones were fillers without even checking because the character designs and story quality would just plummet compared to the manga story arcs.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2027143819
Mate, not every anime that has a "loli" in it is sexualizing said loli. Saying that the mere presence of a child character in anime is pedophilia is like saying the presence of a child in traditional western media is child molestation. A loli is a child (or child like) character, the problem occurs when that character is subsequently sexualized.
Regardless, internet is the wrong place to argue morals. You can't claim "Child harm" on a non-existent character, which devolves the argument into one of superficial morals. Is it creepy to want to see lolis in that way? I'd have to say yeah, obviously it is. Regardless, it's none of my business.
You wanna see something super ♥♥♥♥♥♥ up, go look up Cuties. Those are real children being abused for profit. Can't believe that ♥♥♥♥ hasn't been canceled.