Launcherception

[muckymucks]

Using GOG Galaxy to launch Steam to launch Rockstar launcher

Console peasants are console peasants but at least they don't have to put up with this nonsense.

[harley]

ok

[GhostyOsty]

Yes mock console users because they can play a game that's suppose to be on console.
Very cleaver.

[muckymucks]

Originally posted by THE REAL JOKER™:

i wish everyone would go back to console...

Nobody is stopping you, good-looking.

[L1qu1dator]

I wish everyone would go back to 1998

[HypersleepyNaputunia]

drm heh

[muckymucks]

Originally posted by THE REAL JOKER™:

Originally posted by muckymucks:

Nobody is stopping you, good-looking.

no.. you misunderstand.. i want YOU all gone.. get off my pc...

no.. you misunderstand.. YOU are part of "everyone"..

[sage2001]

There are pros and cons to everything.

[gugnihr]

Originally posted by muckymucks:

Using GOG Galaxy to launch Steam to launch Rockstar launcher

Console peasants are console peasants but at least they don't have to put up with this nonsense.

Because you have to? Really?
Yes of course I know if you just used Rockstar launcher you would have probably died or something like that yes...
Actually no.
If you decide to do nonsensical stuff with your PC it's your problem.
On console you should buy three different of them if you want to play with all of their games, otherwise you will miss many of the best ones.
On PC you can lauunch consecutively as many launchers as you want (I still don't get why anyway) for free because you can download any launcher for free.

Also

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxZfTAIFHqc

those things failed pretty bad, this is why nobody tried to replicate something like that again, otherwise you probably would have tons of those add ons and for sure not for free like a launcher is.

If you really are annoyed stop buying consoles (the first original source of every anti consumer practice in existence) and stop supporting annoying and anti consumer developers and stores on PC

If you want to switch to consoles be prepared to get annoyed at least as much, but having to pay with your money for every annoyance they decide to shove down your throat.

[Vandreal_Wolf]

First of all, Launchers in general are an irritating "quick-use" tool. Honestly one we didn't want but had to come with the onset of digital products. Otherwise you would have issues like you did in the early digital movies. Example: If I wanted to download one of my digital copies from 2001 today I couldn't, because those servers are not up anymore. Also, the ability to transfer them to different devices was problematic and sometimes downright didn't work.
Then you have the issues like every publisher having their own launcher. A.k.A: Rockstar, Bethesda, EA, Ubisoft, Blizzard, etc. Honestly, publishers should have stayed focused on distributing through vendors just like they did with physical stores (i.e. Steam, GOG, and any others like that). I know Steam started/is a publisher platform, but it adapted into more of a full vendor. Even so, from what I hear, GOG has better scripting and not so much bloat-coding on their copies of games.

[DarkStarClassic]

Steam is not that bad as some want you to believe GOG for me is the best of them all specially 100% DRM FREE games pitty it won't have many bigger titles only downside.

I use no other launcher so no Ubisoft-EA Origin Bethesda-Blizzard Epic or rockstar games.

♥♥♥♥ them all.