Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
Тема закрыта 
Правила обсуждений
Пожаловаться
Use some critical thinking instead of buying marketing half truths.
Now that's more believable.
wait you serious!? let me laugh even harder.
What do you mean? PS and XBOX have best controllers on the market.
What comes to life cycle - if they do it like they did with PS4 then you're right, but there still is a hope they will do it like they did with PS2, when it took PCs few years to just match the console level of performance.
o right you can't really control a camera with those 2 little sticks aint it.
Guess people couldn't really control the camera with a mouse.
Platformers, JRPG, slashers, racing/flying simulators, plus the genres you mentioned - those do indeed feel much better on a controller. Joysticks are not gamepads, just pointing out, those are only useful for flight sims. FPS and RTS - those are for m/kb for sure. RPG is pretty questionable. Your userpic points out you like Skyrim - that one is good with both, although UI is optimised for controllers, unless you mod the game. I'd say there are as much games for controllers as there are for m/kb, so I guess it mostly depends on personal preference, but having a controller around is always good. Say, in GTA series driving and flying is a pain without a controller, a lot of GTAV players keep some controller around just for those parts. Having options is awesome.
Yep, thing indeed was a technological achievement. PS2's pixel fillrate and shader capabilities were ahead of any consumer GPU back then. This ended up in a lot of game ports missing effects, sometimes crazy amount, like that awful-looking PC port of GTA:SA.
I wonder why people buy a console for few exclusives when there are way more on PC. Generally, the whole PC library can be played at any time. I still love to play Diablo II every now and then, consoles don't have THAT kind of backwards compatibility. Hence I haven't had a single console since Famicom, being able to keep playing my fav games and tweak options is way more important for me than few exact modern games.
Nevertheless I want to see consoles evolving and succeeding. If consoles would give way better experience for way less money - PC hardware is also going to become cheaper. And AMD APU's might make graphics cards obsolete, just like built-in audio made sounds cards go from mainstream PCs. If whatever AMD put in new consoles will also become available on PC someday - it will make small gaming PC possible. Seeing some smartphone doing things my big hot PC can't is just weird, you know.
For the average user having an aim assistance helps keep the frustration levels down when playing, but anyone who practices enough could probably do just as well without an aim assist on a controller. the controller itself isn't the issue anyway because the XB controller can be plugged into the PC and used without any sort of aim assistance. it's those who wish to add it during development of games on the consoles who thought it was the best idea ever.
In practice it's much lower though. I think it maxes at 200 to 300 watts. Somewhere within that range. But it could go a lot faster. (This includes all hardware connected to it, including monitor, etc..)
It's pretty stuffed with (old) peripherals, seeing how I kept adding to it over the years. I believe it managed to survive at least 2 generations of consoles. Eventually they will probably manage to make something that runs software faster. I´m sure. And then perhaps, I'll replace a part, get it up to spec. But it's not needed right now, as long as it works. And most of it still runs. I'll probably just buy something extremely cheap when it´s required.