Do you think your PC is powerful than the Xbox Series X?

[☄️⁧⁧Sneakydude555]

I kinda dont think mine is. its pretty old hardware. though, my pc can still play modern games nowadays

[RRW359]

Publicado originalmente por Cami 桜:

Publicado originalmente por Snow:

Don't mind the fact Famicom did run games at 60fps in ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ 1983. 8th gen consoles did put gamedevs in a situation where they had to choose between framerate and graphics, and a lot of games are perfectly playable at 30fps.
That said, games that do benefit from 60fps like idk Tekken or Call of Duty do run on 8th gen at 60fps. I see no reasons for XSX to not support 120FPS, considering some game devs already leaked the info of their games having 120FPS mode on XSX.

Source please

Also, I care little for the casual hobbyist trash that supports the Xbone or even *vomits* CoD these days. I'd just like to see the source for the 120fps on the XSX and the devs. I'd love to see the settings said games run in as well you know like antialiasing, how good is the texture filtering? if the game is open world what is the draw distance?, etc. all things that I factor into "graphics" when running a game at a certain resolution. Of course, explaining such settings will go over the head of the average Xbox user (I don't refer to Xbox users as gamers as they aren't)

Didn't know saying facts meant you were an console fan, or that correcting someone about consoles having 60fps games meant you thought they had better graphics.
Most PS3/360 gen first person games were 60 FPS/*ED, while third person games were 30FPS/720p (some games even managed 60FPS/720p or even 1080p). PS4/X1 was usually the same with First Person being 60fps/720p and Third Person being 30fps/1080p.

https://youtu.be/FCl3P3mqZK4
https://youtu.be/Fr4U3DZFdM0
https://youtu.be/HEAKPh_h3Eg

*ED=Enhanced Defenition, anywhere between 640x240 and 1280x720.

[crgzero]

Publicado originalmente por Snow:

Publicado originalmente por crgzero:

I'd almost be proud of it if it weren't for the random hiccups I've had since building it

Any PC will have microstutters in games unless you use CPU-level framerate limiter like RTSS, Special K or GeDoSaTo. That's how they make 30fps on consoles feel smooth.

Not those kinds of hiccups, it runs fine, it runs great, these hiccups are it refusing to post for no appearent reason every few weeks and 2 different techs I took it to swear straight up and down it's running fine. So now I tolerate the fact that every once in a while I have to restart it several times in a row just to get it to boot.

[RRW359]

Publicado originalmente por Cami 桜:

Publicado originalmente por RRW359:

Didn't know saying facts meant you were an console fan, or that correcting someone about consoles having 60fps games meant you thought they had better graphics.
Most PS3/360 gen first person games were 60 FPS/*ED, while third person games were 30FPS/720p (some games even managed 60FPS/720p or even 1080p). PS4/X1 was usually the same with First Person being 60fps/720p and Third Person being 30fps/1080p.

https://youtu.be/FCl3P3mqZK4
https://youtu.be/Fr4U3DZFdM0
https://youtu.be/HEAKPh_h3Eg

*ED=Enhanced Defenition, anywhere between 640x240 and 1280x720.

None of that is a source for what I requested which was 120fps. I never said things weren't possible. What is possible in one game with certain hardware is not going to be possible with another. To achieve that framerate with certain specifications regardless of optimization will require a sacrifice somewhere hence, why I mentioned certain graphical settings. Like none of this is an answer to what I said.

Sorry, I thought you said you didn't think console games could run @ 60fps. I found this in regards to 120.
https://www.windowscentral.com/ori-and-will-wisps-may-run-120-fps-xbox-series-x?amp

I don't think anyone on this forum has claimed console games look better, but people have made claims about them not being capable of certain resolutions or Frame Rates which are worth correcting.

[Snow]

Publicado originalmente por Cami 桜:

how good is the texture filtering

If you'd be at least semi-competent at PCs, you'd knew there's like 1-3% performance difference between x16 AF and no filtering at all. You'd also knew games with a lot of small objects in a high contrast scenes have blurry texture filtering to avoid shimmering, which can not be fixed with typical antialiasing solutions as those only work on the edges of the objects, not inside the objects, thus if some game got a lot of roads, and each line on the road is a part of road texture, not a whole different object - nothing but SSAA can fix it, but low AF can hide it.
The guy has given you an info you asked for, what's the deal now? Tho nothing beats this part.

Publicado originalmente por Cami 桜:

certain graphical settings

You can set RDR2 to the lowest settings possible and 720p and it still won't run 60FPS on X1X. Modern games struggle to run at 60fps on consoles because of the CPU, not GPU. Do google the difference, please.

[erenjeager1510]

Maybe...

[Ⓥenom Ⓢnake 🐍]

I'm quite comfortable with my e-peener, so I don't really feel the need to even check the comparisons.

My rig runs what I want it to run at the settings I want it to run them at. That's more than good enough for me.

[Tuthenutter]

yes, i stole a bike, a football, a fridge, and a human infant to make my pc and the infant doesn't work anymore.

[Blue_Bolt]

We'll see.

From what has been told officially and from the rumours it looks good for my use case.

If I hadn't upgraded I would consider, if:
-(OPTIONAL) it had a Windows mode that supports Epic and Steam just to play already owned games (Don't know if it's possible, maybe through patches);
-it had kb/mouse support;
-it's cheap ($500-600);
-Xbox game pass Ultimate kept with its current prices;

That said the only thing that bugs me are... well... bugs.
Usually on PC if there's a bug I can tweak a few things to keep the game running, on a console I would need to wait for a patch.

This last point is one of the big ones that's keeping me from going for the consoles.
So I'll watch how it goes after the Xbox launches and depending on the support I'll consider it.

[InfinityJosh]

Yes it is faster (4771 RX580 4GB 8GB RAM)

[chiefputsilao✖️ping]

my potato pc vs xbox series x....
i don't even want to know the benchmark results.

[Ulfrinn]

if it isn't now, a simple GPU upgrade will make it more powerful and cost less

[Plastic]

Yes.

Mine can’t even run 2010 NFS Hot pursuit at 25 FPS.

[lailaamell]

Probly stronger

[GuRu Asaki]

I'm hoping my PC will be more powerful then the Project Scarlet Console...

While X-Box & PlayStation will be caching on an SSD...

I might try Caching on an M.2 Drive, maybe, not entirely sure yet...

I would like to try & have;

1 or 2 SSD,
3 M.2 Drives
32 Core CPU 64 Threads (Unsure What Generation)
32 to 64 possibly up to 128 GB DDR4 RAM? (Unsure How Much)
Radeon VII GPU with 16 GB VRAM (Already Owned)
M.2 Caching
ASUS Motherboard (Not Sure What Generation)
10 USB Ports
10 + gbps Eathernet Port
Sound Card with 7.1 Surround Sound


Weather or not it out beats the X-Box Scarlet or PS5,
it should definitely be more powerful then the one I currently
am using now... So regardless of how powerful it will be,
it is most likely an Upgrade... ^__-

[Q-T_3.14.exe]

I don't know much about computer, probably.