Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
Matter of opinion I guess. It's definitely better than the early Assassin's Creed games it was modeled on. People kept telling me Black Flag was awesome, however I noticed AC had clunky-a$$ controls where sprint, jump, and climb were all bound to the same button. Nothing worse than running too close to a wall and accidentally climbing up it. On PC the AC games are borderline unplayable.
Also, If I remember correctly, there is also something like twice as many ways to assassinate targets in The Saboteur than in Assassin's Creed, which is hilariously ironic. Kicking guys to death, tossing dudes into a fire places, snapping necks, or crushing people with falling debris never gets old.
And it had no stupid Animus fragments or that Abstergo crap, which by itself probably makes it superior.
I don't think AC games are good. They are simplistic, have shallow story (they really do) No consequence from actions, they however have.. Open world and grinding.
Those two things can be alright, but its to much of the same without innovation.
Innovation, not so much. You come for the terrorism simulator and stay for the classy jazz soundtrack.
The AC franchise has anything but a shallow story.
It's one of the most expanded and detailed mythos' you'll come across these days.
I assume that is sarcasm.. hahaha
It's not. ^^
Can you elaborate why you find it shallow?
I can try to list a few points if you want, that also touch other areas
The story is not very good and tbh its pretty predictable (doh often if in games like these)
The AI is awful, they are simplistic and don't interact well in the world (common OW problem)
Its linear, gives you a false feeling of choice.
It has a 100% focus on "lets kill some Nazi's" theme and its the selling point
It has huge techical problems.
Combat is simplistic and in many ways the same old same
Don't get me wrong, its good at what it tries to be.... your standard "console like" false openworld with linear progression and simplistic combat.. Its a model many other games before and after use, some people like it and I guess it can be decent sometimes..
But this game just had to much techical issue, simplistic story and Ai for me to think it was not awful
But I see valid points for other people.. Some people like that shallow open world gameplay style.. Just look at how AC do.
I think you misunderstood... I wasn't asking about Saboteur, I was asking you to elaborate on why you find the AC-story shallow.
Aaah, my bad. Shouldnt be blaming the developers, but EA instead. I can only imagine the frustration of the people who worked hard to create that game, and then not being able to fix/finish the game. Its such a waste of man hours...