FARCRY 3 VS FARCRY 4
So Farcry 3 and Farcry 4 are both phenomenal games but i am posting this disscussion to debate upon which game is better:)
Écrit par Panazois λ:
Sagma a écrit :
So Farcry 3 and Farcry 4 are both phenomenal games but i am posting this disscussion to debate upon which game is better:)
I would say Far Cry 3 is the best. The thing Far Cry 4 suffers a little bit is that the gameplay is almost the same with Far Cry 3. Although Far Cry 4 adds a lot of other things to the table. Far Cry 4 has better graphics and more things like weapons and skills. However Far Cry 4's story is not that great. Just a man who tries to bring her mother's ashes who is stuck between a war with 2 corrupted leaders and 1 guy who rules the land who is also corrupted but deep down he wants the best for the land and for you as well. Far Cry 3 however has a very good depth into it's story. It's not just some guy who tries to rescue his friends and get out of the island. It shows some character development. Far Cry 4 does not do that. Far Cry 3 shows Jason's insanity growing the longer he stays there.
< >
Affichage des commentaires 16 à 30 sur 55
farcry 4, because in FC3 they killed vaas half way of the game :lunar2019madpig:
Dernière modification de zuppaclub; 27 juil. 2020 à 3h27
ElvisDeadly a écrit :
Far Cry 2

Because you don't have malaria in the later ones and where is the fun in that?
True
Mötley a écrit :
Far cry 3 because it is located at jungle islands like far cry 1 and this engine is at best with jungle islands
Yea the jungle setting is where farcry is at it's best but what do u guys think about the gameplay between the two games?
zuppaclub a écrit :
farcry 4, because in FC3 they killed vaas half way of the game :lunar2019madpig:
Lol:steammocking:
J4MESOX4D a écrit :
I liked Far Cry 3 the best. The location was stunning, the story was actually pretty decent and the villian Vaas was iconic. Stealthing enemy outposts from afar was always great fun as was the nature aspect and travelling around in vehicles.

Sadly many of the elements that made that game so good have been saturated among many other open world AAA games particularly ones from Ubisoft since.
The main thing that they left out in fc4 was the stealth sequences because in fc4 the stealth felt too forgiving and if u messed it up the enemies forgot u in just a short span of time so fc3 gets a point in that aspect
Sagma a écrit :
J4MESOX4D a écrit :
I liked Far Cry 3 the best. The location was stunning, the story was actually pretty decent and the villian Vaas was iconic. Stealthing enemy outposts from afar was always great fun as was the nature aspect and travelling around in vehicles.

Sadly many of the elements that made that game so good have been saturated among many other open world AAA games particularly ones from Ubisoft since.
The main thing that they left out in fc4 was the stealth sequences because in fc4 the stealth felt too forgiving and if u messed it up the enemies forgot u in just a short span of time so fc3 gets a point in that aspect

i always felt the opposite on FC3, it is like the hostiles can spot you even in heavy cover, your subtly attempts are as much use as driving a vehicle off a cliff and watching it explode below next to an active hostile outpost in comparison.

at least in FC4 you can hide and the hostiles have to come out and find you, not to state that you can't be spotted even in cover if they are wound up enough.
Xautos a écrit :
Sagma a écrit :
The main thing that they left out in fc4 was the stealth sequences because in fc4 the stealth felt too forgiving and if u messed it up the enemies forgot u in just a short span of time so fc3 gets a point in that aspect

i always felt the opposite on FC3, it is like the hostiles can spot you even in heavy cover, your subtly attempts are as much use as driving a vehicle off a cliff and watching it explode below next to an active hostile outpost in comparison.

at least in FC4 you can hide and the hostiles have to come out and find you, not to state that you can't be spotted even in cover if they are wound up enough.
The main thing that i also like about fc4 is the way the enemies react u can actually feel that they are alive and they have their own personalities whereas in fc3 there were fixed number of voice lines that the enemies would repeat all the time but the main thing about stealth in fc3 is that if u crouch the enemies can't see u even if they are at the wince of seeing u their bars would go back to normal like they magically forgot that they were suspicious about something in the bushes whereas in fc4 if u crouch when the enemy is at the wince of seeing u he or she would come to investigate so yea ur point is also nice so that's a point up for Farcry 4
tiny E a écrit :
Doesn't FC 3 require an additional client to play?

FC3 and FC4 require Uplay.
Sagma a écrit :
Xautos a écrit :

i always felt the opposite on FC3, it is like the hostiles can spot you even in heavy cover, your subtly attempts are as much use as driving a vehicle off a cliff and watching it explode below next to an active hostile outpost in comparison.

at least in FC4 you can hide and the hostiles have to come out and find you, not to state that you can't be spotted even in cover if they are wound up enough.
The main thing that i also like about fc4 is the way the enemies react u can actually feel that they are alive and they have their own personalities whereas in fc3 there were fixed number of voice lines that the enemies would repeat all the time but the main thing about stealth in fc3 is that if u crouch the enemies can't see u even if they are at the wince of seeing u their bars would go back to normal like they magically forgot that they were suspicious about something in the bushes whereas in fc4 if u crouch when the enemy is at the wince of seeing u he or she would come to investigate so yea ur point is also nice so that's a point up for Farcry 4

one thing that i like in FC4, is that you can troll those hostile soldiers into the open, if you are particularly sadistic, you can lob some molotovs and crowd them into the center and then listen to their dying screams, like sweet music to your ears. xD

FC3 hostiles just wonder around their camps looking for you spamming their dialogue. even crouched and you are looking at them from cover they will spot you quickly from a distance.

of course in FC4 it isn't really needed after taking most of those propaganda towers, the mg42 will perforate anything in half a dozen hits.
Xautos a écrit :
Sagma a écrit :
The main thing that i also like about fc4 is the way the enemies react u can actually feel that they are alive and they have their own personalities whereas in fc3 there were fixed number of voice lines that the enemies would repeat all the time but the main thing about stealth in fc3 is that if u crouch the enemies can't see u even if they are at the wince of seeing u their bars would go back to normal like they magically forgot that they were suspicious about something in the bushes whereas in fc4 if u crouch when the enemy is at the wince of seeing u he or she would come to investigate so yea ur point is also nice so that's a point up for Farcry 4

one thing that i like in FC4, is that you can troll those hostile soldiers into the open, if you are particularly sadistic, you can lob some molotovs and crowd them into the center and then listen to their dying screams, like sweet music to your ears. xD

FC3 hostiles just wonder around their camps looking for you spamming their dialogue. even crouched and you are looking at them from cover they will spot you quickly from a distance.

of course in FC4 it isn't really needed after taking most of those propaganda towers, the mg42 will perforate anything in half a dozen hits.
Me too bcuz i always love the fc series and i crashed like 15 times bcuz steam and uplay were both running and the background and i have a nice pc
The main thing that i loved about fc3 was the story the way that Citra lures u into being a warrior and making u believe that u are destined to be a warrior was done beautifully and in the end when u are given the choice of killing liza or joining her and in both the endings u feel like man that was brutal
Far Cry 3 better villain and you get two. FC4 was a drag and the villain was like a camp handsome jack, but not funny. Primal is my fave Far Cry anyway. FC5/ND sucked. Instincts and Blood Dragon was fun. FC1/2 a bit dated now.
Far Cry 3 better villain and you get two. FC4 was a drag and the villain was like a camp handsome jack, but not funny. Primal is my fave Far Cry anyway. FC5/ND sucked. Instincts and Blood Dragon was fun. FC1/2 a bit dated now.
OK i respect ur opinion
Far Cry 3 was better than 4. The best description of 4 i've heard is that it was a DLC of Far Cry 3. Nothing really stood out in 4, it was just 3 in a different location with downgraded villains. Overall i'd vote for #3. I also liked the choice option in 3 better than 4, choosing your friends vs boobies. In 4 where your choice was one scumbag vs another scumbag...not that great.

However...
1) I liked the castle element in 4 where there were regional castles that you weakened with each outpost you took or you could take on the castle if you wanted.
2) The Far Cry 4 DLC up in the mountains with the yeti was pretty great. I liked the change that you couldn't just buy new weapons or unlock them via outposts but you had to go find someone that had the weapon or it's location and then it unlocked for you. It was something different and i enjoyed it.
2a) I also enjoyed the base defense that you had to do.
Sagma 27 juil. 2020 à 19h43 
-EAT3N- a écrit :
Far Cry 3 was better than 4. The best description of 4 i've heard is that it was a DLC of Far Cry 3. Nothing really stood out in 4, it was just 3 in a different location with downgraded villains. Overall i'd vote for #3. I also liked the choice option in 3 better than 4, choosing your friends vs boobies. In 4 where your choice was one scumbag vs another scumbag...not that great.

However...
1) I liked the castle element in 4 where there were regional castles that you weakened with each outpost you took or you could take on the castle if you wanted.
2) The Far Cry 4 DLC up in the mountains with the yeti was pretty great. I liked the change that you couldn't just buy new weapons or unlock them via outposts but you had to go find someone that had the weapon or it's location and then it unlocked for you. It was something different and i enjoyed it.
2a) I also enjoyed the base defense that you had to do.
The main about 3 is that the way that they showed the transformation of Jason from a naive 20-year old to a fierce one man army and it showed through the game how Jason's insanity took hold of him and in the final choice if u choose to save ur friends then u showed that u still have the weak and nice person inside u and u got that personality out and dennis kills citra and stuff but if u chose to kill liza and ur friends then well we all know that Citra kills u so i loved the message that they put in fc3's story so that's a point up fc3
< >
Affichage des commentaires 16 à 30 sur 55
Par page : 1530 50

Posté le 26 juil. 2020 à 23h55
Messages : 55