Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
Talk about devaluing the currency. It devalues the nation, crumbles the economy. Puts people in a state of disrepair
Sorry, but having to watch ads for it instead of paying money doesn't make it "free", and yeah maybe you should just sell it directly. But I have a very strong suspicion about the reason why you don't.
then get a real job and stop mooching of your viewers for money
That only allows them to pay creators, with the assumption that they have to or have agreed to do so. If someone doesn't watch your videos, they really aren't paying you at all; they paid YouTube to keep their doors open, and the advertisers help to keep the doors open and pay creators.
Using AdBlock to cease videos from functioning saves bandwidth as well, bandwidth is costly and that 5 second video will pre-load a majority of the video rather than only the first 5 seconds; thus bandwidth saved is money saved. If companies would be more in the modern era, especially youtube, they wouldn't need to do this practice as quite frankly; ads are out of date, and anti-ads are stopping from countless wasted bandwidth and portions of pages. If they got more into the modern era rather than making and enforcing silly rules and being political rather than their original "Broadcast yourself", then they'd likely be doing completely fine.
Creators are NOT entitled to anything; not the dis-use of adblocks, not income, not subscriptions, not followers. If people like your videos, they can watch it. If you want guaranteed income, you personally can force a subscription-only model that people en-masse are going to say "no thanks" on, which is why sponsorships are also a thing, otherwise we'd have countless channels/sites dedicated to one person, so the model is not self sustaining overall unless you have something actually worth subscribing to compared to the services users prioritize.
And here come the insults.
https://www.google.com/search?sxsrf=ALeKk01mbDO5HZ3tkIocSaxZRf94zpBDRQ%3A1594593757847&source=hp&ei=3ZELX6mtMcK4tAbn56XgBw&q=jobs+near+me&oq=jobs+near+me&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQAzIFCAAQsQMyBQgAELEDMgIIADIFCAAQsQMyAggAMgUIABCxAzICCAAyAggAMgIIADICCAA6BAgjECc6BQgAEJECOggIABCxAxCDAVCcBFj4EWCPE2gAcAB4AIABUIgB0waSAQIxMpgBAKABAaoBB2d3cy13aXo&sclient=psy-ab&ved=0ahUKEwjpj_vT5MjqAhVCHM0KHedzCXwQ4dUDCAk&uact=5
That's also it; it's not so much you for video watching; it's that ads play on your videos, the ads have value and you get a share of assisting to reach the goal of the particular advertiser(s) so YouTube can collect on their agreement of either per-view to total number of ads played. In this case, you're just a useful tool to them, not an employee or contractor.
So, if you do consider this a job and make money off of it, don't be surprised if you get Audited accordingly if you're a US Citizen. If you're not, it's up to the country you live in that may want a portion for you generating money while residing wherever you do, but you can still have a portion seized between youtube and yourself.
Just remember that, they only consider you a tool to assist in generating their own revenue based upon existing agreements, and like SuperChats; if you make anything, they get a rather large percentage of it because it's their business and service, not yours.