Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The notion of genre is highly subjective and also often attributed to marketing strategies as opposed to any actual systematic classification.
Certain genere definitions may require elements of specification, such as electronic synthesis or alternatively the use of accoustic instruments. The issues with further definitions often arise when elements of two or more genre tropes coincide. SHould this cbe considered belonging to either or all such, or warrant its own genre. This becomes meaningless and defeats the point of broad genre classification when individual albums or tracks then may warrant their own genre identification.
Therefore, call it what you will. If it makes sense to you, and benefits you in classification or organisation, then it serves its purpose.
1. Action Rock Instrumental
2/3. Orchestral / Symphonic
2&3 are also sometimes referred to as "epic."
Cinematic and production music is often tagged with keywords to describe the mood or feeling of the music like "uplifting", "moving", "sentimental", etc.
Here are some examples:
Action Rock:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67nFv1K5KN4
Epic Rock:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TucKUi0jmHk
Epic Orchestral:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnlHNXCPuPQ
No problem, I actually work with production music in my line of work so I kind of understood what you were getting at.