Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I was more wondering as to why Mozilla would not feel the user made mods and other installers are bad, but feel that Blizzards installer is. I'd assume that there is something this particular installer is doing different; but what?
This is just out of curiosity by the way. I am not worried about Blizzards installer, just curious if anyone else ever ran into it and figured it out.
I'd love to see proof of this, given that they don't use it in any of their code nor have any reason to.
yea just use google chrome. I use both browsers.
mozilla firefox 74.0 (64bit)
mozilla firefox 74.0.1 (64bit)
all downloads successful on my mind.
wth is mozilla firefox doing?