Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
I see you don't understand it, some people don't play like casuals falling asleep while playing with slower reflexes than their grandma.
Your comparison is fundamentaly wrong, it's not about "will it run? / can I play with 60hz?", yes it will run and play.
But when you let race your Civic vs the Bugatti, it will become something different.
I'm not playing Sims or Skyline Cities where even 30Fps 60Hz are awesome, we're talking about competitive gaming where you give your best to make your team win. If it's tryharding or competitive, 60Hz is such a cap for your skill.
People used to accuse me of hacking, with 60Hz it's more like sleeping not playing.
It's pretty easy:
1. Right click on your desktop.
2. Choose "Display Settings" (second from the bottom.)
3. A window will pop up and then in the content section at the bottom, you will see "Advanced Display Settings", click it.
4. Choose your monitor and click at the "Adapter settings for display XY" or something like that.
5. A new window will open and choose the "Monitor" (The middle one) tab.
Here you can select your refreshrate. The GPU is able to set the refresh rate, if it wouldn't be possible, then Free/G-Sync wouldn't exist.
You don't know enough to become loud here my dear friend.
We had 120hz already with CRTs, Sony FW900 ? or something like that could be overclocked to 120hz+.
I would rather have a 1080p60hz CRT than a 1080p60hz LCD monitor.
'''I DON'T NEED MORE THAN 60HZ!!! IT'S PERFECTLY FINE!!!''
Then I bought a 144-165hz monitor. And damn, 60hz looks like 15-30fps compared to it.
It's a literal slideshow.
I don't know. Maybe I just need to dedicate a year to solely 144Hz before it'd bother me or something.
I couldn't justify spending $2K to get a 120 or 144 Hz monitor. Now I have slight, but noticeable, screen tearing in some of my games.
Well, sounds like you're taking video games too seriously, IMO.
My analogy was for playability, not competition. Unplayable and not good for competition are not the same thing.
Name me one competitive FPS player who plays on a 60Hz Monitor.
120hz is still twice as good as 60hz )
Yeah, you can still do stuff on 60hz, but if you're given the choice, you'd pick the 120hz monitor 10/10 times.
I know it's a joke and bait, but I'll reply anyway.
There is little difference between 240hz and '''365hz''' (1.4ms), whereas the difference between 60hz and 144hz is 9.4ms.
(And the difference of 144hz vs 240hz is 2.8ms.)
So there wouldn't be as much of an increase as you'd think.
Big number doesn't mean big change.
Also, iirc, a human (eye) can't really notice anything below 4-5ms difference.
I got my 1440p165hzG-sync monitor for 420 quid....
You can get 1080p144hz monitors for half that.
VR may replace monitors, be we're A LONG LONG time away from that.
If you paid 2K for a 60hz Monitor... yeah....