安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
Kinda the user's fault. It's not like 8 TB drives don't exist.
I for example have 50 games installed out of the 292 in my library and I am nearly out of storage.
yeah, I realized what you meant after. My bad. I mean I still don't blame Steam at all for that. I wouldn't even blame a Home Depot for selling a person five truckloads of wood and they had nowhere on their property to hold it.
Stadia is worse, you lose access to the games when Google decides to no longer support them, kill Stadia or you stop paying. That is also a thing I can see Google do, drop certain games for various reason after 10-ish years.
I agree with this.
I can see it becoming a thing. I wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole at the moment but if people do this for music, movies, tv I can DEFINITELY see them doing this for games. Getting rid of download/updates is temping. Games are huge nowadays and seems like every time you load up the system 25% of your games need an update. I can see simple folks loving the idea of avoiding all this.
And don't be suprised if they will show ads in games.
Lmao Google Stadia isn't gonna kill PC gaming at all. They're two different realms.
All gaming websites are going crazy for this Stadia, something are saying that some developers may skip pc and doing games for Stadia at first.
Same happened with Nintendo Switch and every other handheld console before that. Until it's out no one knows what's going to happen. PC gaming has 15+ years of foundation. A Google product isn't going to kill it. It's like someone said above, I'd expect adverts within games and data mining like crazy. This is the equivalent of EA making a console.
I always think that using your dedicated hardware and play with LAN will be better than streaming because of latency, then also resolution will be downgraded if you don't have a good Wi-Fi.
The difference is that they will invest in a direct connection between ISP & their datacenters (they clearly explained that on the presentation). Having control over the backbone of the connection is what will improve a little bit the latency... but it will stil bel a little high.
What everyone have to think is that this new service is not suitable for every type of game. I mean, in a game where the key factor is the user reaction, it'll probably not be a good option. But on rpg like games with gigant evironments (mmorpg), RTS and many others, this platform is heaven. Also, it could be an excellent option for sports game where having a subscription seems to be more rasonable that buying almost the same game every year and that the latency isn't a key factor on the gameplay.
Regarding the "ownership" of a game, what will be the point of having a copy of PUGB in ten years from now if no one is playing that game anymore? As I said, it all depends on the type of game...
"Regarding the "ownership" of a game, what will be the point of having a copy of PUGB in ten years from now if no one is playing that game anymore? As I said, it all depends on the type of game..."
Yes, online games" ownership" would be useless but i was talking about single player games, if i buy one game and i like it then may be that I'll play it other times in the future without paying anything more, in a streaming service if it don't have indeterminate access option to the game you'll not can do this.
"The difference is that they will invest in a direct connection between ISP & their datacenters (they clearly explained that on the presentation). Having control over the backbone of the connection is what will improve a little bit the latency... but it will stil bel a little high."
Probably it will be not free of problems at least for the first years but in the future with decent Wi-Fi this would be fixed. I now want to be optimistic, according to what i see from playstation now, nobody has stopped buying consoles but it can be a good way to try new games without buy the console, according to what i see from GeForce now, nobody has stopped buying Nvidia GPU but it can be a little alternative for the ones that don't want to spend too much to buy one. If Google Stadia will be nearly the same of PSnow and GeForce Now it wouldn't be a trouble for me but i would be sorry if it were no longer possible to play with dedicated hardware.