If six bullets is more enough to kill anything that moves, then what's the prerequisite amount of bullets?

[JelliedKnife]

Title says it all.

[Hayter]

you only need one for the head *blows revolver smoke*

[chiefputsilao✖️ping]

abywhere between 1 lunch and 5 acres.

[Plaid]

could you reword that? there is no bullet prerequisite.

[JelliedKnife]

Początkowo opublikowane przez Plaid:

could you reword that? there is no bullet prerequisite.

What I mean is that it's implied that six bullets is more than the maximum amount of bullets needed to kill anything, and I'm asking how many bullets is the maximum.

[Danksama]

Początkowo opublikowane przez JConlisk:

Początkowo opublikowane przez Plaid:

could you reword that? there is no bullet prerequisite.

What I mean is that it's implied that six bullets is more than the maximum amount of bullets needed to kill anything, and I'm asking how many bullets is the maximum.

'More than enough' does not mean that it's more than a maximum, just that it's more than a reasonable amount.

[JelliedKnife]

Początkowo opublikowane przez Danksama:

'More than enough' does not mean that it's more than a maximum, just that it's more than a reasonable amount.

Well, whats the reasonable amount of bullets?

[Danksama]

Początkowo opublikowane przez JConlisk:

Początkowo opublikowane przez Danksama:

'More than enough' does not mean that it's more than a maximum, just that it's more than a reasonable amount.

Well, whats the reasonable amount of bullets?

Probably a couple

[O5]

Zero, if you're good enough.

[O5]

Początkowo opublikowane przez Plaid:

Please don't read the bible.

Ok. I guess I won't then.

[628]

Everything depends on what we kill, what body part to be shot, what ammo and gun we use, and how close we are to the target. And I believe knowing this never requires us being a professional gun wielder.
Several .22LR shots would be a scrach for an elephant, not so leathal to human beings too, for example.

[JelliedKnife]

Początkowo opublikowane przez Wooden Board:

Everything depends on what we kill, what ammo and gun we use, and how close we are to the target. And I believe knowing this never requires us being a professional gun wielder.
Several .22LR shots would be a scrach for an elephant, not so leathal to human beings too, for example.

Well lets say the gun for instance is a 45 magnum, or a Colt Single Action Army as it's commonly referred to.

[Xero_Daxter]

I love 6 shooters. No mags, no jams (less than semis), fixed sights, and hard as a rock when you pistol whip.

[JelliedKnife]

Początkowo opublikowane przez Uncah_Puff:

Maybe I read that wrong, are you asking if your weapon holds six rounds how many should you carry?

I'm asking that, in the scenario that you've shot somebody 6 times but your target was already dead a few bullets ago, how many bullets would be the amount you shoot somebody dead with without having wasted a bullet or two.

[Midnight Sky ✨🌙✨]

Początkowo opublikowane przez JConlisk:

Początkowo opublikowane przez Uncah_Puff:

Maybe I read that wrong, are you asking if your weapon holds six rounds how many should you carry?

I'm asking that, in the scenario that you've shot somebody 6 times but your target was already dead a few bullets ago, how many bullets would be the amount you shoot somebody dead with without having wasted a bullet or two.

Ignoring any variables like aim and where you hit them, one shot is enough.

[Radene]

I don't think "6 bullets" counts as "loaded for bear".

Początkowo opublikowane przez Uncah_Puff:

There is really no 'X amount of rounds needed', you put lead in 'em till they drop, then a few more to be sure

If you kill a dude, you take him out of the fight. But if you just wound him, you take him out of the fight, but also his buddy who has to stop fighting to drag the wounded guy to safety. Suddenly you took out 2 enemies with one bullet.

Also, this logic also don't work against enemies who took quantity ideas, and have therefore basically unlimited manpower.