'doggo'speak

[36564176]

this post is inspired by r/doggohate
does anyone else dislike this doggospeak phenomenon? instead of just saying dog and puppy it's now 'doggo' and 'pupper' and there are many other made up words. i actually think 'doggo' and 'pupper' are just a bit annoying but the real cringe comes in when poeple start using the other words like 'henlo' and 'hooman' and they take these dog/cat videos and add extra chromosomes to most of the words in this style

[36564176]

Starbug님이 먼저 게시:

BlackCobra님이 먼저 게시:

Honestly what the fu** do you know about parenting?

It is a proven fact that kids can get language difficuluties if they are not engaged with normal common language and only hear this degenerated crippled English.

Who's a gorgeous wee thing. Wook at your wovely wee romper suit. Aren't you adowable? Yes you are, yes you are. Going to steal your wittle nowse .. oh wook, I've got your nowse.. you're so bewtiful.. gonna eat you awive.

yes, very good, make yourself look dumber in an attempt to... provoke? annoy?

[Jonathan Sensei]

Kresinite님이 먼저 게시:

Jonathan님이 먼저 게시:

That's in part because some people consider their dogs to be their own children or babies.

i hate people who call their pets their babies too, so that's no coincidence.

Then you would find me annoying because I consider my dog to be part of my family. But, he's still a dog to me.

[HeroicHeathen]

Jonathan님이 먼저 게시:

BlackCobra님이 먼저 게시:

A bit hard if your dog is called " Sir Winston Churchill "

I have a rule with naming dogs.

"Never name your dog something you would be embarrassed to yell aloud".

So no, not hard at all.

I should have thought about that before naming my dog Zatan, this might explain why people look at me weird when I call him in the forest.

[Starbug]

disappointed님이 먼저 게시:

Starbug님이 먼저 게시:

Who's a gorgeous wee thing. Wook at your wovely wee romper suit. Aren't you adowable? Yes you are, yes you are. Going to steal your wittle nowse .. oh wook, I've got your nowse.. you're so bewtiful.. gonna eat you awive.

yes, very good, make yourself look dumber in an attempt to... provoke? annoy?

Let me be completely honest. This is how I talk to animals and small children. Whether that hairlips anyone else is not important to me. To attempt to coach it in terms of "it's dumbing down kids" is really quite pedantic and borderline stupid.

[Galactic Yoshi]

I didn’t know saying “doggo” and “pupper” bothered people, but now I’m going to start using those words

[HeroicHeathen]

Starbug님이 먼저 게시:

disappointed님이 먼저 게시:

yes, very good, make yourself look dumber in an attempt to... provoke? annoy?

Let me be completely honest. This is how I talk to animals and small children. Whether that hairlips anyone else is not important to me. To attempt to coach it in terms of "it's dumbing down kids" is really quite pedantic and borderline stupid.

I assume you are not even above the age of 18, hence your massive lack of knowledge in parenting.

Everyone who has basic knowledge about raising kids knows to NOT talk to them any differently than you would talk to your adult son or daughter. At least in terms of voice and words used, to cutify things too much is always negative for the child's developed.

That being said, I am a parent and also a student of psychology. If you think I am making things up here, I am sorry for your future kids.

[Starbug]

BlackCobra님이 먼저 게시:

Starbug님이 먼저 게시:

Let me be completely honest. This is how I talk to animals and small children. Whether that hairlips anyone else is not important to me. To attempt to coach it in terms of "it's dumbing down kids" is really quite pedantic and borderline stupid.

I assume you are not even above the age of 18

That's the dangerous thing about making assumptions about people online. You can underestimate their ages by a few decades.

Maybe also use your undergraduate psychology class attendance to quantify your lonely standpoint. Unless you've any peer reviewed papers on the subject of the dangers of baby speak viz a viz developmental progression. Didn't think so.

[Commander Makara]

BlackCobra님이 먼저 게시:

No he does not. He means people who destroy entire senteces and talk like this " henlo my fren, do pooper want chimken nuggers? " something like this, we are talking about a kind of people that overdo it far beyond just a few cute words.

I don#t have any experience of this - sure some people, such as my niece - may speak like this to their infants but I don't have a problem with this either.
Otherwise never heard it used when speaking to anyone over the age of 18 months, so perhaps it's a cultural or regional thing or maybe the OP just surrounds themselves with the sort of people who have difficulties with language.

[Jonathan Sensei]

Starbug님이 먼저 게시:

That's the dangerous thing about making assumptions about people online. You can undestimate their ages by a few decades.

It's more dangerous to get carried away with something trivial when at the end of the day, it really doesn't matter.

[Phirestar]

I've never cared for any of the made-up garbage that the internet has created. It always makes people sound stupid, in my opinion.

[HeroicHeathen]

Starbug님이 먼저 게시:

BlackCobra님이 먼저 게시:

I assume you are not even above the age of 18

That's the dangerous thing about making assumptions about people online. You can underestimate their ages by a few decades.

Maybe also use your undergraduate psychology class attendance to quantify your lonely standpoint. Unless you've any peer reviewed papers on the subject of the dangers of baby speak viz a viz developmental progression. Didn't think so.

How is it dangerous to assume? I am judging you by what you say and this unfortunately is very immature.

I don't need any " peer reviewed papers as you say " and I am working on my Master degree, so I am not new to this either.

Commander Makara님이 먼저 게시:

BlackCobra님이 먼저 게시:

No he does not. He means people who destroy entire senteces and talk like this " henlo my fren, do pooper want chimken nuggers? " something like this, we are talking about a kind of people that overdo it far beyond just a few cute words.

I don#t have any experience of this - sure some people, such as my niece - may speak like this to their infants but I don't have a problem with this either.
Otherwise never heard it used when speaking to anyone over the age of 18 months, so perhaps it's a cultural or regional thing or maybe the OP just surrounds themselves with the sort of people who have difficulties with language.

And what about all the time before 18 months? You start talking to a baby from day one not only after 18 months and 18 months is pretty developed in language already.

A few cutified words, no problem, but there are people who overdo it again and only talk like this all the time, this is definitely not healthy for a child.

But all the millenials here obviously know better what a child needs, most of these people haven't even reached college yet and try to talk out about what is good and what is bad for a toddler when learning to speak. It is always the same situation on steam, a pool for spoiled teenagers to go full keyboard warrior.

I am outta here.

[36564176]

Commander Makara님이 먼저 게시:

BlackCobra님이 먼저 게시:

No he does not. He means people who destroy entire senteces and talk like this " henlo my fren, do pooper want chimken nuggers? " something like this, we are talking about a kind of people that overdo it far beyond just a few cute words.

I don#t have any experience of this - sure some people, such as my niece - may speak like this to their infants but I don't have a problem with this either.
Otherwise never heard it used when speaking to anyone over the age of 18 months, so perhaps it's a cultural or regional thing or maybe the OP just surrounds themselves with the sort of people who have difficulties with language.

sometimes im in bed just scrolling through pet videos and then i see a video with retardoggo subtitles "gibve me teh hekkin trets karen! dooin me a starev!" and sometimes i browse r/doggohate. so pretentious

[Starbug]

BlackCobra님이 먼저 게시:

I am outta here.

Probably for the best. You were starting to get quite neurotic in that finger-pointy judgement. A millennial calling other people millennials as a pejorative was kinda darkly ironic.

[Blargo]

I think it's worth reiterating that this is a really trivial thing, and holy crap, people are actually upset over it.
What a thread.

[Jonathan Sensei]

Dxpress님이 먼저 게시:

I think it's worth reiterating that this is a really trivial thing, and holy crap, people are actually upset over it. What a thread.

And it's only Saturday!