安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
That depends entirely on whoever is doing the "seeing". And many women would consider such a man to not be someone capable of commitment or empathy.
Based on my observations in Brazil they are. But then again perhaps your country is more civilized.
If she has been with hundreds of men, do you think she will be loyal and honest to you? It is different if she has had sex out of love for a past boyfriend.
If you want to marry a girl that has sex with strangers at bars, that's up to you.
Um, yeah...hello? I would have thought so too.
In the olden days it was easy to spot the cavemen who hated feminists. Since the advent of the internet, things have changed. Now people can easily hide their biases behind anonymous comments, that try to sound reasonable.
It's also not "my" definition of feminism. It's the understanding I arrived at after reading and talking with people for the past few decades. I would never presume to try and define feminism...that would be kind of obtuse and clueless, in my mind.
I've known radical lesbians who hate men. That has little to do with "feminism". Even those angry women didn't mind me being around all that much, but they obviously would have preferred if I didn't show up. People with unreasonably harsh opinions generally don't appreciate having living and breathing examples of their own ignorance offering to make them a cup of tea.
Maybe. It's a long shot. But if not, well, I can always say "Sorry, lady, but this ain't working".
This trust and commitment thing goes both ways.
I didn't say I would want to marry such a girl, just that there are double standards in society (that just don't make logical sense).
thats the way to go.. in this...overly """feminized"" world... *sorry i cant take this topic seriously haha
but good for you tho :D
Why would it matter if a girl would have fcked a lot of guys.. or a guy had fcked a lot of girls.. when two people meet eachother and feel the connection and that they are right for eachother then u gotta let go of the past... no? besides - I actually feel good if a guy has slept around, at leasy he has run off his "horns" lol, and knows what he wants and can settle down and not feel that he is "missing something" or that he hasnt experienced something that he would like to
Yeah, this thread will eventually be locked. My wise 8-Ball crystal ball said so.
So take your time and choose your words carefully. Just ignore the blithering tirades of white noise swirling about you...that's what I try to do.
No. I'm afraid that's impossible. You can accept it, work it into the relationship, or ignore it (not recommended), but you can't really pretend it didn't happen.
It's not a group or a club. That goes against the nature of the philosophy "Men, going their OWN way". It's a way of life.
It't not "narcissistic", it's actually "completely defeating the point".
Tho I don't see what it has to do with "liberals". Could also be conservatives or reactionaries.