安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Edit: Did you mean that Beatport is more popular than Bandcamp so lower prices make them a more compelling option and allows them to compete?
I was actually trying to google why Bandcamp is more expensive than Beatport.
I found a few other examples as well.
https://peggygou.bandcamp.com/album/seek-for-maktoop
https://www.beatport.com/release/seek-for-maktoop/1858144
Unlike Beatport, Bandcamp allows you to listen to the whole track before purchasing and if you do buy a track it lets you download in whatever format you like. On Beatport you are only paying for MP3's which on it's own still costs more than Bandcamp. You have to pay extra for higher quality formats and even then you can only choose one of two formats (.WAV or AIFF), you cannot have both as far as I know. This is why it's so confusing to me that Beatport costs more, they are offering less for a higher price. The only real upside I see for Beatport is that they seem to have a lot more mainstream music compared to Bandcamp.