安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
The Kardashians for instance.
I doubt those dumb ♥♥♥♥♥ can even tie their own shoes.
They were born rich...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5jf9GH8BX4
For starters those IQ tests are questionable just like how countries far to much today rig academic exams so the country scores higher.
A true test of IQ is to give someone an unsolvable puzzle and time how long it takes them to figure that out.
...no
That is why official tests are standardized.
And your test is flawed. The highest IQ person according to your test, would be whoever figures out the quickest that it is impossible and puts it down. Not due to just giving up, but explaining how it is unsolvable.
I'm reminded of an oldish, kinda beat-up looking minivan I once saw with a mensa bumper sticker on it (and Mensa is mostly just puzzle games anyway, all that collective brain power isn't actually going to anything of real use)
A question is a question whether its solvable or not because it would still have to be solvable to work out its not. Basically its like taking 30 questions that logically take an hour to complete and instead giving them 1 question that takes that amount of time but unlike the current IQ test allows a different gauge measurement due to extension because certain factors in the test arent factored.
You would not get a sophisticated or academic occupation, which pays definitely more than most jobs. Yet, the jobs which pay well tend to be extremely hard and hold the risk of mental illness.
All depends on what you would take and not take as "happiness".