Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
if its on their own launcher i wont bother , im no big elderscrolls fan
Me neither, but Fallout 76 and potentially DOOM Eternal might be.
Being worse than Skyrim doesn’t mean the game will be bad.
By the time TESVI releases it will be around a decade since Skyrim came out and they would have worked on F4 and Starfield in the meantime, there’s no way I can think of it being too close to Skyrim just based on the timeframe alone
This point is fine
They’d have to hire 20 voice actors for every gender of every race to give TES a voiced protagonist, and considering the reaction of it in F4 was mostly negative I doubt they’d have one
ESO was not made by Bethesda and they’ve repeatedly stated they are still going to focus on single player games
Make your character locked in and unchangeable, as a toddler moth priest who wanders around in a diaper.
He'd be great
Also ESO is not a mistake so far, but people like to claim everything. Otherwise the game wouldn't exist anymore.
Honestly. I'd play the hell out of that...
Part way through your character goes blind to save the developers from having to create textures and worlds for the rest of the game.
Noooooooooooooo