安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
That aside, interesting read, good work.
It's very silly. We aren't in 1983 anymore. Videogames aren't in the same position they were then, still trying to find a cultural foothold. Yes, companies can (and do) collapse, game development has always been kind of a risky world, but there's no dire existential threat. I make no personal judgement of OP specifically, but my general impression is that for the most part, this talk is largely just people seeing things they don't like succeed and wanting there to be some kind of divine punishment for that. An abundance of crappy media is normal, in all sorts of media categories.
Because during those years 1983 we had pretty good games on C64/Atari/amiga computers they flourish at that time (atleast in eu market).
What i am trying to say it will at most change focus and like what miss ann trhope is saying its not a niche and vulnable market any more. Its a market for everyone to enjoy.
I think what that means is that we will see more division with many different gaming clients on the PC. I think this could mean that PC games will be poorly optimized with the lack of support that the console versions will have.
Steam haven't developed first party exclusives for years with the exception of the eSports titles which have regular updates. Microsoft are finally starting to offer first party exclusives with excellent support to the Windows 10 store while major developers like Bethesda are boycotting Steam with their own client.
Scummy DLC, microtransactions, and loot box practices are already bad today, imagine how bad they’ll be in the next couple of years if devs don’t get their priorities straight.
Which games did you play that only had a few hours play time?
There was no big PC gamer market then, it was consoles and the few games they had that crashed. It was a very long time coming before the intervention of the indie market and use of physics engines let alone peoples hardware and knowledge good enough to produce any.
OP, your conflating and as such should be ignored.
Well I am an rpg player, and compared to older ff, 15 was rather short, and especially console games always are short on how long to beat, theres really not many games with 50 hours or more, far cry 5 doesn't even have 20 hours on how long to beat
Sorry, your history is way off. If you think Iris Heart could be dangerous when she goes HDD, then you clearly haven't met the CPU of Tari.
Tari, superpower of old. First nation of Gamindustri. Ruled by a CPU that is nothing short of crazy. Crazy enough to not only make her citizens revolt, but also lash out against them in response, effectively causing the "Great crash" and destroying Tari.