安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Actual cultural appropriation is when you claim a heritage or an ethnicity you don't have, usually for some benefit. Like a certain politician who tried to claim Native American descent where none actually exists. Or like my sister who has naturally dark skin and was told by one of the goons at the unemployment office to claim her race as Native American when she applied for jobs at certain types of businesses so she'd be more likely to get hired and less likely to get fired.
In relation to the infamous video - If a white person wearing dreads is cultural appropriation, then it's cultural appropriation when black people dye their hair blond, like Nicki Minaj.
Of course, why someone would even choose to wear dreads in the first place is questionable, but my point still stands.
Don´t be too quick to judge; You have people who are born in one culture, but still have strong ties with close family members in another culture. And thus identify with that culture, even if there is only a connection through blood. You know that just as well as I.
It´s a thing. Apparently. People tend to call it a sub-culture. A silly word, if ever there was one.
Cultural appropriation does sound more... sophisticated. But still wrong, because the close family members lived there all along. So one adopts some kind of hybrid culture, and often very different from the original.
But you´re right. It´s not as I would like to have it either. It´s complicated.
Many people want to belong or identify with something, to be sure.
I don´t think there is anything inherently wrong with that. But there isn´t much right with it either. It´s just the way it is. You can´t change the past, and you can´t really take it with you either, without changing they way you perceive it in the present.
But I try not to think about that stuff too much. So *do* call it whatever you like.
For me, it just makes things interesting.
Assimilating, blending, borrowing and sharing are all perfectly normal. It's only a problem when you do it with the intent to mislead.... or try to shove it down somebody else's throat under the guise of multiculturalism which is pretty much the most disgusting, disrespectful and destructive thing you can do to a person's culture. Especially when you claim to have an ounce of respect for it.
I've spoken at length with so-called SJWs (I wish there was a better alternative to that tired term) on the subject.
Their logic is as follows : if, say, a white person wears dreads, they are unlikely to suffer from negative stereotypes and prejudices as a result, which isn't necessarily the case for a black person. Therefore, white people do not have the right to "take the good without the bad".
If you can get them to realize that their issue is with cultural discrimination, not appropriation, they often realize that the leap of logic towards authoritarianism is a petty and irrational reaction.
I don't agree with the idea that cultural mores, including religion, deserve special respect. They're nothing more than an opinion. Would you show the same deference towards a political or economic theory?
Someone of a different faith shouldn't be going around wearing attire of another faith unless your a true believer of that faith (just my opinion on this).
Plus were I live in britian, we have many faiths all mixed together and it's like a cauldron waiting to explode. And you just don't go out wearing other faiths religious clothing, its just utter disrespectful.
Plus someone mention snowflakes, snowflakes like to talk to the talk and pretend we live in a world full of unicorn and happeness but the truth is we don't.