Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Then they take you to the furthest part of the outback and drop you off in the desolate wasteland.
But you should know that, as the poster, I would feel that way about it.
Sounds like an awesome nanny. The kind I'd hire for any kid I'd need to supervise.
Last I heard, possession itself is illegal in Western Australia, and maybe parts of the NT.
It is, however, legal to possess RC (Refused Classification) games (except in Western Australia and prescribed areas of the Northern Territory).
In New Zealand, we had the game Postal 2 banned (something I played as a kid and enjoyed). Now, a fine of NZ$2,000 ($1,400) can be imposed on anyone caught with a copy, and anyone who "supplies, distributes, exhibits, displays, or advertises Postal 2 could be imprisoned for up to a year or fined NZ$20,000 ($14,000)." Larger, "incorporated distributors and retailers" could be fined NZ$50,000 ($38,000).
So it comes down to mostly distributing/selling it, but yeah some places will still fine you for just playing a banned game.
ps: Ironically, the other Postal games in the series are not banned in New Zealand.
Just make sure you don't play for longer than your spell's duration.
It goes against their babysitting policy.
Saints Row 4 was initially refused classification due to sexual violence and drug use; I think that objection was later reduced to just the drug use. In any case, there’s an Australian version which leaves out a side mission, and that got it accepted.
https://youtu.be/t5ltfJFkiiA
I think that's the right video.
even tho the whole point of the game is against it...
And maybe a better Youtube channel to watch. I mean really, the first of the links in her description goes to a page explaining that in NSW, you can’t claim self-defence as mitigation if you kill someone only to protect your property or prevent trespass. Which makes perfect sense, because no ♥♥♥♥, that’s quite literally not self-defence.
We do have a problem with violence against women and personally I’d be pretty open to people being able to carry something like pepper spray. But this woman is defending breaking someone’s neck or smashing them over the head with a bat. That anyone finds it “weird” that such acts aren’t just accepted is bizarre to me.