安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Christian religion is probably a more obvious rubbish (it literally is based on fantasy stories), and communism masks its lack of logical foundation quite a bit better - but both are pretty easy to see for what they are, as long as you look independently and aren't influenced by the respective preachers.
If it were propaganda, religion would have suffered the same swift and brutal fate Communism always does.
Except Communism doesn't hold societies together. The empirical evidence speaks for itself - the lifepsans of religions are measured in centuries or millenia. No state or empire lasts longer. I have already made this point and have yet to hear an argument for why any other sort of "powermongering" is superior, particularly in light of the enlightnment - if you'll forgive the pun.
I don't think religion is nearly as simple as people make it out to be - fairy tales and whatnot. If it were so, it would be easy to replicate, a feat that our science based on replicating experiments has yet to do. I think a lot of people just mock it because they beleive it to be popular without ever thinking about what causes it to work.
Religious though I may be, I am not above the secular. There are biological reasons why religion is preferred and why it prospers in the face of everything. Those who say "religion is foolishness" and cannot explain why or how are essentially saying they believe in a power that they do not know the nature of. Who are they to say there is no god? As far as their minds are concerned, they already have several that they obey without knowledge or question. Hunger, thirst, life, entropy. It is not beyond the reach of a god to influence the biological, especially when it's a god of creation.
But I didn't post here with the intent of discussing religious matters, merely empirical evidence. And empirical evidence states that Jesus is one of the most influential figures in history. Subjectively, he was one of the coolest, too, offering redepmtion to everyone through their own desire for salvation.
Maybe He was just a Jewish peasant trained in carpentry. Maybe He was completely human, and maybe it was just a coincidence that He fulfilled a bunch of prophecies, some of which might have been deliberately fudged. Maybe all of them were. The results cannot be denied.
All that said, this is my opinion, backed by what knowledge I have accrued. If you don't like it, you don't like it, you don't have to follow it, but don't waste my time re-hashing the same pathetic attacks on religion that have been going on for over a century. The day somebody makes a succssful society that is atheistic, my very logical self will listen to it. Until then, you're spitting into the wind.
It always results in a flamewar.
Thats all you lot are doing - reading titles. None of you actually know or knew anything about anyone other than a description. The only thing you can know about someone is yourself. And even that you all cannot do.
(Also moot topic. Coolest person is clearly me ;) )