安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
The majority of the women were in medical roles, but many were in combat roles.
This is why i really hate the "gaming" community. Nothing personal.
I think this is likely some asian JRPG/MMORPG problem, because i can't recall this in the modern times of World Of Warcraft for example. I do agree with Vanilla, there were some.. "interesting" breastplates, i used to make a fortune on the auction house with them lmao.
I can't remember the last game with actual "female sexy armor" lately, except Conan Exiles but the entire universe is.. likely sexy and bloody so.
this is a historically accurate photo found recently (1944 colorized)
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1304907474
There's also one that has the female character demand to have the same armor types, and then the last panel has male character ultra happy about being able to show off his sixpack and pecs.
>Battlefield
Did you even see the trailer, there's not a single hint that it would be historically accurate, nor has DICE claimed that BFV would be historically accurate (the multiplayer, atleast)
Same goes to COD:WW2 imo, the females were only in multiplayer, which was never meant to be historically accurate. I honestly disliked people because of that, WW2 was a good game, it's just that it was foreshadowed with the whole SJW and lootbox / mxtransaction arguments
I didn't mean to sound like I am against a single character in a game that has not even come out yet. I was talking about historical games in general. I admit sometimes a game can be fun even if not accurate, but there's still that thought in the back of my head about the lack of accuracy.
It is the most realistic BF game, with all the new physical interactions. Period.
And i already said that the MP wasn't meant to be historical accurate, i mean look at BF1.
and yes I did see the trailer it’s a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ mess
That is the actual issue. BF1 had pretty good warstories and i believe they were historical accurate and it won't be different with BF5. But the hate people produce about a videogame, especially about a trailer is mindblowing.
It just got announced. The only info i can give is @ E3, because i might end up playing it anyway, if there is a booth. I think you might confuse this game with another title.
Realism also applies to the time period. It wouldn’t be realistic to have a female soldier in the american army in a WWII game
first we didnt get ww games for ages , and only the same modern shooters with FN P90s HK Mp7 and the other weapons that everyone knows
now devs make ww2 games but still manage to make them suck
https://i.redditmedia.com/TQZoAU0RA5rZ1lAgjJxGikz2jwX2oLq_ArIwcAh9y2I.jpg?w=522&s=4879e1f0c47339a0761b68e99ed2233a
This is whats happening currently, not in this thread though.