Will battlefield V have swastikas

[Johnson]

I hope they are brave enough to do it waw did it and its one of the best cod games

[Sable]

引用自 iza：

引用自 KING_THATCHA'：

Maybe you are incels...

And criticism doesn't qualify when it comes to in-games' accuracy if nothing was ever branded to be one. So what if she has a prosthetic arm? She just used it to hold big weapons. Why are you making a big deal out of something that could make perfect sense, despite being fake?

MUH REALISM, ONE SIMPLE PROSTHETIC!

I don't think they understand the definition of an incel, i could show this thread to your average joe with a few braincells and they could tell this isn't about Battlefield or EA, it is because women in videogames, pulling the MUH REALISM card is so weird. They made the statement "most realistic BF so far" and they're absolutely right it is. Heck even BF1 had fast moving vehicles and people didn't care, now they're whining about this game, NOT SUSPICIOUS AT ALL!

I couldn't care less if they want to put women as soldiers in a WW2 game. We had Night Witches and Lyudmila Pavlichenko in WW2, and if they had used any of the real female badasses we got in history, that'd have been fine. I take issue with a WW2 soldier, having a prosthetic arm, battering enemies with some stupid bat with nails.

[Daxank]

引用自 Sable：

引用自 iza：

MUH REALISM, ONE SIMPLE PROSTHETIC!

I don't think they understand the definition of an incel, i could show this thread to your average joe with a few braincells and they could tell this isn't about Battlefield or EA, it is because women in videogames, pulling the MUH REALISM card is so weird. They made the statement "most realistic BF so far" and they're absolutely right it is. Heck even BF1 had fast moving vehicles and people didn't care, now they're whining about this game, NOT SUSPICIOUS AT ALL!

I couldn't care less if they want to put women as soldiers in a WW2 game. We had Night Witches and Lyudmila Pavlichenko in WW2, and if they had used any of the real female badasses we got in history, that'd have been fine. I take issue with a WW2 soldier, having a prosthetic arm, battering enemies with some stupid bat with nails.

it's useless to argue with her, she'll just call you an incel and diss your arguement.
Report her and move on

[Dirty Dan]

引用自 iza：

引用自 KING_THATCHA'：

Maybe you are incels...

And criticism doesn't qualify when it comes to in-games' accuracy if nothing was ever branded to be one. So what if she has a prosthetic arm? She just used it to hold big weapons. Why are you making a big deal out of something that could make perfect sense, despite being fake?

MUH REALISM, ONE SIMPLE PROSTHETIC!

I don't think they understand the definition of an incel, i could show this thread to your average joe with a few braincells and they could tell this isn't about Battlefield or EA, it is because women in videogames, pulling the MUH REALISM card is so weird. They made the statement "most realistic BF so far" and they're absolutely right it is. Heck even BF1 had fast moving vehicles and people didn't care, now they're whining about this game, NOT SUSPICIOUS AT ALL!

“It’s not that they want to be properly immersed in one of the most eventful wars in history....they simply ALL hate women!”

Can’t fake this kind of stupidity.

[iza]

引用自 Sable：

引用自 iza：

MUH REALISM, ONE SIMPLE PROSTHETIC!

I don't think they understand the definition of an incel, i could show this thread to your average joe with a few braincells and they could tell this isn't about Battlefield or EA, it is because women in videogames, pulling the MUH REALISM card is so weird. They made the statement "most realistic BF so far" and they're absolutely right it is. Heck even BF1 had fast moving vehicles and people didn't care, now they're whining about this game, NOT SUSPICIOUS AT ALL!

I couldn't care less if they want to put women as soldiers in a WW2 game. We had Night Witches and Lyudmila Pavlichenko in WW2, and if they had used any of the real female badasses we got in history, that'd have been fine. I take issue with a WW2 soldier, having a prosthetic arm, battering enemies with some stupid bat with nails.

I mean, have you watched any WW2 movies? They did use meele weapons aswell if range was no option and if a spike club is a thing.. meele weapons and especially different ones exist since BFBC2 i believe. Just you're speaking different words, have you seen the other thread? That was some first class ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ and it wasn't about the game at all.

引用自 Daxank：

引用自 Sable：

I couldn't care less if they want to put women as soldiers in a WW2 game. We had Night Witches and Lyudmila Pavlichenko in WW2, and if they had used any of the real female badasses we got in history, that'd have been fine. I take issue with a WW2 soldier, having a prosthetic arm, battering enemies with some stupid bat with nails.

it's useless to argue with her, she'll just call you an incel and diss your arguement.
Report her and move on :cinnamon2:

Bruh you are afraid of having sex with girls because they could end up reporting you to the police, those were your own words. Actual incel. Look up the definition.

[Jinn-Gon Qui]

引用自 Daxank：

引用自 KING_THATCHA'：

Maybe you are incels...

And criticism doesn't qualify when it comes to in-games' accuracy if nothing was ever branded to be one. So what if she has a prosthetic arm? She just used it to hold big weapons. Why are you making a big deal out of something that could make perfect sense, despite being fake?

because you can't claim to be realistic and still do that.
Plain and simple. If you can't understand that then please leave because you lack the brain cells required to even have a plausible arguement

Where or when did they claim it was realistic? What, because the game is set during a historical war, then that means it has to be realistic? But Call of Duty: WWII is the same, and Sledgehammer Games never claimed the game to be historically accurate. But the thing is, the Multiplayer isn't accurate. The campaign, however is, which I have no doubt in my mind that the Singleplayer and perhaps even the Co-op for Battlefield V will be historically accurate. But then again - no video game is real; only a simulation to extend. So for the millionth time, it's a video game. Basing it on a historical war is a theme.

Don't contradict yourself by telling anyone that they're lacking brain cells when you're the one who struggles to comprehend the difference between reality and imagination; video games being imaginary; video games not being based on reality and should never be taken for granted or seriously.

PLAIN AND SIMPLE. If you can't comprehend the difference stated above, I suggest you leave and get a reality check, chief.

[iza]

引用自 KING_THATCHA'：

引用自 Daxank：

because you can't claim to be realistic and still do that.
Plain and simple. If you can't understand that then please leave because you lack the brain cells required to even have a plausible arguement

Where or when did they claim it was realistic? What, because the game is set during a historical war, then that means it has to be realistic? But Call of Duty: WWII is the same, and Sledgehammer Games never claimed the game to be historically accurate. But the thing is, the Multiplayer isn't accurate. The campaign, however is, which I have no doubt in my mind that the Singleplayer and perhaps even the Co-op for Battlefield V will be historically accurate. But then again - no video game is real; only a simulation to extend. So for the millionth time, it's a video game. Basing it on a historical war is a theme.

Don't contradict yourself by telling anyone that they're lacking brain cells when you're the one who struggles to comprehend the difference between reality and imagination; video games being imaginary; video games not being based on reality and should never be taken for granted or seriously.

PLAIN AND SIMPLE. If you can't comprehend the difference stated above, I suggest you leave and get a reality check, chief.

There is a difference between historical accurate and realism and people don't seem to understand, it is very easy to cherrypick words and hop into a hatetrain so...

I am a sucker for immersion, but Multiplayergames aren't supposed to be THIS immersive, though BF1 gave me a small vibe, just i am playing with friends and having a blast, nothing else.

[Daxank]

引用自 KING_THATCHA'：

引用自 Daxank：

because you can't claim to be realistic and still do that.
Plain and simple. If you can't understand that then please leave because you lack the brain cells required to even have a plausible arguement

Where or when did they claim it was realistic? What, because the game is set during a historical war, then that means it has to be realistic? But Call of Duty: WWII is the same, and Sledgehammer Games never claimed the game to be historically accurate. But the thing is, the Multiplayer isn't accurate. The campaign, however is, which I have no doubt in my mind that the Singleplayer and perhaps even the Co-op for Battlefield V will be historically accurate. But then again - no video game is real; only a simulation to extend. So for the millionth time, it's a video game. Basing it on a historical war is a theme.

Don't contradict yourself by telling anyone that they're lacking brain cells when you're the one who struggles to comprehend the difference between reality and imagination; video games being imaginary; video games not being based on reality and should never be taken for granted or seriously.

PLAIN AND SIMPLE. If you can't comprehend the difference stated above, I suggest you leave and get a reality check, chief.

They litteraly said during the conference "THE MOST REALISTIC BATTLEFIELD GAME SO FAR"

If you're not even informed about the subject why waste our time?!

引用自 iza：

There is a difference between historical accurate and realism and people don't seem to understand, it is very easy to cherrypick words and hop into a hatetrain so...

Nobody would send a handicapped woman/man on a battlefield. NOBODY!

[Alpha_pro]

引用自 iza：

引用自 Sable：

I couldn't care less if they want to put women as soldiers in a WW2 game. We had Night Witches and Lyudmila Pavlichenko in WW2, and if they had used any of the real female badasses we got in history, that'd have been fine. I take issue with a WW2 soldier, having a prosthetic arm, battering enemies with some stupid bat with nails.

I mean, have you watched any WW2 movies? They did use meele weapons aswell if range was no option and if a spike club is a thing.. meele weapons and especially different ones exist since BFBC2 i believe. Just you're speaking different words, have you seen the other thread? That was some first class ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ and it wasn't about the game at all.

引用自 Daxank：

it's useless to argue with her, she'll just call you an incel and diss your arguement.
Report her and move on :cinnamon2:

Bruh you are afraid of having sex with girls because they could end up reporting you to the police, those were your own words. Actual incel. Look up the definition.

Hes right, your just using the "women" card, it shows your weak and that youll use your sex as an excuse, I know that women are perfectly capable of fighting in wars as men, but when you say we are mad because there is a women in the trailer, shows your perssonal weakness.

[Jinn-Gon Qui]

引用自 iza：

引用自 KING_THATCHA'：

Maybe you are incels...

And criticism doesn't qualify when it comes to in-games' accuracy if nothing was ever branded to be one. So what if she has a prosthetic arm? She just used it to hold big weapons. Why are you making a big deal out of something that could make perfect sense, despite being fake?

MUH REALISM, ONE SIMPLE PROSTHETIC!

I don't think they understand the definition of an incel, i could show this thread to your average joe with a few braincells and they could tell this isn't about Battlefield or EA, it is because women in videogames, pulling the MUH REALISM card is so weird. They made the statement "most realistic BF so far" and they're absolutely right it is. Heck even BF1 had fast moving vehicles and people didn't care, now they're whining about this game, NOT SUSPICIOUS AT ALL!

It's how these imbeciles who think they know what they're talking about take all the small details and never look at the bigger picture - which is what you said: "BF1 had fast moving vehicles and people didn't care, now they're whining about this game, NOT SUSPICIOUS AT ALL!"

There's awfully a lot of things in video games that are so unreal, but the majority simply have to take all the smallest of details and think that's what the games are supposed to be based on. Boo-♥♥♥♥♥♥♥-Hoo.

[Hayter]

引用自 KING_THATCHA'：

引用自 Daxank：

because you can't claim to be realistic and still do that.
Plain and simple. If you can't understand that then please leave because you lack the brain cells required to even have a plausible arguement

Where or when did they claim it was realistic?

they asked one of the devs b4 the reveal trailer will your game be like saving private ryan (realistic) or like inglorious bastards ( unrealistic)

he said like private ryan lol

[Sable]

引用自 iza：

引用自 Sable：

I couldn't care less if they want to put women as soldiers in a WW2 game. We had Night Witches and Lyudmila Pavlichenko in WW2, and if they had used any of the real female badasses we got in history, that'd have been fine. I take issue with a WW2 soldier, having a prosthetic arm, battering enemies with some stupid bat with nails.

I mean, have you watched any WW2 movies? They did use meele weapons aswell if range was no option and if a spike club is a thing.. meele weapons and especially different ones exist since BFBC2 i believe. Just you're speaking different words, have you seen the other thread? That was some first class ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ and it wasn't about the game at all.

I do not speak for them and they do not speak for me. I will not buy Battlefield V, not just because it's an EA game (which they already pissed me off after the crap they did to Westwood), but because it doesn't feel like a WW2 game from what I've seen.

If I want an unrealistic FPS with some melee weapons, I'll go back to playing L4D2.

[Propiniukas]

Woah take a chill pill

[iza]

引用自 Sable：

引用自 iza：

I mean, have you watched any WW2 movies? They did use meele weapons aswell if range was no option and if a spike club is a thing.. meele weapons and especially different ones exist since BFBC2 i believe. Just you're speaking different words, have you seen the other thread? That was some first class ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ and it wasn't about the game at all.

I do not speak for them and they do not speak for me. I will not buy Battlefield V, not just because it's an EA game (which they already pissed me off after the crap they did to Westwood), but because it doesn't feel like a WW2 game from what I've seen.

If I want an unrealistic FPS with some melee weapons, I'll go back to playing L4D2.

Either you wait until the upcoming E3 and i can tell you myself or you just watch the gameplay. I mean all you've seen was a (i agree on this) bad trailer, but i remember the "trailer" guy working for DICE left a year ago so it would make sense.

[Jinn-Gon Qui]

引用自 Sable：

引用自 iza：

MUH REALISM, ONE SIMPLE PROSTHETIC!

I don't think they understand the definition of an incel, i could show this thread to your average joe with a few braincells and they could tell this isn't about Battlefield or EA, it is because women in videogames, pulling the MUH REALISM card is so weird. They made the statement "most realistic BF so far" and they're absolutely right it is. Heck even BF1 had fast moving vehicles and people didn't care, now they're whining about this game, NOT SUSPICIOUS AT ALL!

I couldn't care less if they want to put women as soldiers in a WW2 game. We had Night Witches and Lyudmila Pavlichenko in WW2, and if they had used any of the real female badasses we got in history, that'd have been fine. I take issue with a WW2 soldier, having a prosthetic arm, battering enemies with some stupid bat with nails.

And maybe we will have some real badass women in the game, specifically in the Singleplayer. But I'm just speculation as much as you're judging. So I say, let's not judge yet and hope for the best.

[Jinn-Gon Qui]

引用自 iza：

引用自 KING_THATCHA'：

Where or when did they claim it was realistic? What, because the game is set during a historical war, then that means it has to be realistic? But Call of Duty: WWII is the same, and Sledgehammer Games never claimed the game to be historically accurate. But the thing is, the Multiplayer isn't accurate. The campaign, however is, which I have no doubt in my mind that the Singleplayer and perhaps even the Co-op for Battlefield V will be historically accurate. But then again - no video game is real; only a simulation to extend. So for the millionth time, it's a video game. Basing it on a historical war is a theme.

Don't contradict yourself by telling anyone that they're lacking brain cells when you're the one who struggles to comprehend the difference between reality and imagination; video games being imaginary; video games not being based on reality and should never be taken for granted or seriously.

PLAIN AND SIMPLE. If you can't comprehend the difference stated above, I suggest you leave and get a reality check, chief.

There is a difference between historical accurate and realism and people don't seem to understand, it is very easy to cherrypick words and hop into a hatetrain so...

I am a sucker for immersion, but Multiplayergames aren't supposed to be THIS immersive, though BF1 gave me a small vibe, just i am playing with friends and having a blast, nothing else.

And Multiplayer isn't even where the story is based on, but the Singleplayer campaign/s. Most games who have both Singleplayer and Multiplayer modes are exactly like that.