Sega 32X or Sega Saturn?

[Twinkie Wiener Sandwich]

In terms of what Sega proposed as the "Future of Gaming", which one was the best of the two?

[Rio]

The sega saturn doode

But both systems sucked because the lack of games. Though if you include all the games the regular sega could play with the 32x off then..... its a harder choice. But that's mainly cuz regular sega and not the 32x.

[Plaid]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Carpel:

The sega saturn doode

But both systems sucked.

Nah, the Saturn was a good machine. They were both underutilized, however.

[Rio]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Plaid:

Diposting pertama kali oleh Carpel:

The sega saturn doode

But both systems sucked.

Nah, the Saturn was a good machine. They were both underutilized, however.

I had a saturn, maybe the system itself was nice but the lack of games and them all being super expensive was ugh.

Even sega seemed to know it, so with my saturn it was bundled with daytona usa, virtual fighter 2, and virtual cop 2.

It was a mess, sega saturn, sega 32x, sega cd. Like if someone gave you a sega cd game for xmas, the saturn wouldn't play it, outside of the games music track.

[Cleverhardy (She/Her)]

I'm not sure really. The 32X failed, because this was just a few months before the Saturn, which was a fully 32-bit system. The Saturn was deemed okay, and it had potential, but it was losing to the Playstaion, and without many Sonic games, the Saturn wasn't popular. It couldn't do high quality 3D graphics that outdoes the Playstation despite the latter having a software chipset.

[Full_Throttle_F14]

Game Gear? ahead of its time

[Rio]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Cleverhardy (Out of College):

I'm not sure really. The 32X failed, because this was just a few months before the Saturn, which was a fully 32-bit system. The Saturn was deemed okay, and it had potential, but it was losing to the Playstaion, and without many Sonic games, the Saturn wasn't popular. It couldn't do high quality 3D graphics that outdoes the Playstation despite the latter having a software chipset.

Oh there were sonic games, good old Sonic CD (Not on the saturn), sonic 3d blast (Which could be played on regular sega gen), sonic ring whatever it was 32x game, the sonic collection thing. And I think that horrible sonic running racing game.

But hey if you love on the rails shooter there was panzer dragon... And the over praised nights into dreams (Which you can buy on steam)

[Cleverhardy (She/Her)]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Carpel:

Diposting pertama kali oleh Cleverhardy (Out of College):

I'm not sure really. The 32X failed, because this was just a few months before the Saturn, which was a fully 32-bit system. The Saturn was deemed okay, and it had potential, but it was losing to the Playstaion, and without many Sonic games, the Saturn wasn't popular. It couldn't do high quality 3D graphics that outdoes the Playstation despite the latter having a software chipset.

Oh there were sonic games, good old Sonic CD (Not on the saturn), sonic 3d blast (Which could be played on regular sega gen), sonic ring whatever it was 32x game, the sonic collection thing. And I think that horrible sonic running racing game.

But hey if you love on the rails shooter there was panzer dragon... And the over praised nights into dreams (Which you can buy on steam)

Yeah. When there were Sonic games for the Saturn, they were given mixed reviews. Sonic 3D (Traveller's Tales) was ported from the Sega Genesis as a plan B, because a Sonic Saturn game was in development hell, and they needed to get a launch title out by Christmas. Like the Genesis version, the game recieved mixed reviews.

As did Sonic R. And Sonic Jam was nothing more than a compilation.

[InfinityJosh]

Nintendo 64

[Fajita Jim]

After being upsold on the CD/32X and then getting no real support for the platforms, I never bought Sega hardware again.