Will my spec run battlefield 1 smooth?

[CHICKENWINGCHUN]

Will this spec run battlefield 1 smoothly?
i7 3770 non k
8 GB ram
GTX 1050 ti

[Rumpelcrutchskin]

If you add 8 GB of RAM then decently enough.

[Xautos]

your cpu is quite a few generations old and won't reach recommended specs, your ram reaches minimum specs and your graphics are not quite there on recommended specs either.

you might be able to play it on medium settings, just don't expect mind blowing performance.

[Rumpelcrutchskin]

60 fps on high settings should be pretty reasonable to expect, might have to switch to medium settings to get more stable fps. That's for 1080p ofc.

[CHICKENWINGCHUN]

So medium setting still gets me a better performance?

[CHICKENWINGCHUN]

Im running on a monitor of 1080p or do I need to replace the monitor to a 1440p?

[Xautos]

the more resolution you are looking for the more resources it will take to fill the screen, 1080p should be more than enough.

but yeah, medium is probably as far as your computer can manage, your CPU is slower than your GPU so that will create a bottleneck in performance and your ram only reaches minimum standard. your computer won't have the resources it needs to run at better settings and medium is probably as much as your computer can manage. if your experience isn't that great, bring the settings down. shadows take a lot of resource as does some shaders, so you might need to dial those back to increase performance.

[CHICKENWINGCHUN]

Alright that what I expect to get afterall

[CHICKENWINGCHUN]

Btw I saw this video people running 1080p in battlefield 1 with an i7 2600,8gb,and gtx 1050 ti in map called amien both 64 player conquest and 24 player in tdm,he gets about 50-80 fps in low and medium but ultra only at tdm mode gets about 40-60 fps.Here is the link ( https://youtu.be/WxhMzqNaCPY )

When I saw it I was checking deeply about i7 2600 and i7 3770 and the high core speed is i7 3770 try check at userbench btw also I did check the official intel about both processor.

[CHICKENWINGCHUN]

So is it maybe the similar fps I would get in med to low?

[Rumpelcrutchskin]

Originally posted by LEGIONITE:

Im running on a monitor of 1080p or do I need to replace the monitor to a 1440p?

The higher the monitor resolution goes the more powerful hardware you need to run it.
1440p monitor would need GTX 1070 or better graphics card, 16 GB RAM and better CPU.
4K monitor would need GTX 1080 Ti.
That's what I meant with 1080p.

The game will be playable enough with your hardware on medium/high settings and would run smoother with less slowdowns if you upgrade to 16 GB RAM.

[CHICKENWINGCHUN]

Originally posted by Rumpelcrutchskin:

Originally posted by LEGIONITE:

Im running on a monitor of 1080p or do I need to replace the monitor to a 1440p?

The higher the monitor resolution goes the more powerful hardware you need to run it.
1440p monitor would need GTX 1070 or better graphics card, 16 GB RAM and better CPU.
4K monitor would need GTX 1080 Ti.
That's what I meant with 1080p.

The game will be playable enough with your hardware on medium/high settings and would run smoother with less slowdowns if you upgrade to 16 GB RAM.

Don't want to be rude or rebel person but can you explain how can this man gets better perfomance on low to med except high and ultra which I saw the high and ultra was freezing and stutter
https://youtu.be/WxhMzqNaCPY

[Xautos]

Originally posted by LEGIONITE:

Btw I saw this video people running 1080p in battlefield 1 with an i7 2600,8gb,and gtx 1050 ti in map called amien both 64 player conquest and 24 player in tdm,he gets about 50-80 fps in low and medium but ultra only at tdm mode gets about 40-60 fps.Here is the link ( https://youtu.be/WxhMzqNaCPY )

When I saw it I was checking deeply about i7 2600 and i7 3770 and the high core speed is i7 3770 try check at userbench btw also I did check the official intel about both processor.

i wouldn't trust that in the video, there is no way you can actually verify anything in that.

[CHICKENWINGCHUN]

Originally posted by Xautos:

Originally posted by LEGIONITE:

Btw I saw this video people running 1080p in battlefield 1 with an i7 2600,8gb,and gtx 1050 ti in map called amien both 64 player conquest and 24 player in tdm,he gets about 50-80 fps in low and medium but ultra only at tdm mode gets about 40-60 fps.Here is the link ( https://youtu.be/WxhMzqNaCPY )

When I saw it I was checking deeply about i7 2600 and i7 3770 and the high core speed is i7 3770 try check at userbench btw also I did check the official intel about both processor.

i wouldn't trust that in the video, there is no way you can actually verify anything in that.

I'd say I agree your reason.

[Rumpelcrutchskin]

There is no way of knowing the full details of those Youtube benchmarks, there are many variables like overclocked CPUs, amount of RAM, cooling etc. that is often never disclosed in those videos.
Also some people downright fake those videos for arbritary results, that's actually quite easy to do since you have no way of verifying if settings that they show you are actually same that are used to run the game or if the hardware used is even same that they claim to be.

[CHICKENWINGCHUN]

Originally posted by Rumpelcrutchskin:

There is no way of knowing the full details of those Youtube benchmarks, there are many variables like overclocked CPUs, amount of RAM, cooling etc. that is often never disclosed in those videos.
Also some people downright fake those videos for arbritary results, that's actually quite easy to do since you have no way of verifying if settings that they show you are actually same that are used to run the game or if the hardware used is even same that they claim to be.

I don't know as well but I saw a small letter when you full screen your desktop there is 2 word said i7 2600 and gtx 1050 ti which that what made me trusted