Installera Steam
logga in
|
språk
简体中文 (förenklad kinesiska)
繁體中文 (traditionell kinesiska)
日本語 (japanska)
한국어 (koreanska)
ไทย (thailändska)
Български (bulgariska)
Čeština (tjeckiska)
Dansk (danska)
Deutsch (tyska)
English (engelska)
Español - España (Spanska - Spanien)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanska - Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (grekiska)
Français (franska)
Italiano (italienska)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesiska)
Magyar (ungerska)
Nederlands (nederländska)
Norsk (norska)
Polski (polska)
Português (Portugisiska – Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugisiska - Brasilien)
Română (rumänska)
Русский (ryska)
Suomi (finska)
Türkçe (turkiska)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesiska)
Українська (Ukrainska)
Rapportera problem med översättningen
Or maybe Frisian, just to confound people.
Study Mandarin. It is the official. Beijinghua.Standardisation will come soon, to all regions.
I don't want to pick a fight with Tessa, but Mandarin Chinese and Arabic aren't really viable candidates for the same reason that Communist countries never adopted Cyrilic. Nobody outside of the cultures understands their alphabets, and since that's most of the world, they won't be adopted. The Latin alphabet is the go-to because the Latin-speaking Roman Empire spawned the cultures that spread their language across the globe.
It's also a lot more efficient than Pictograms or Arabic. Arabic is the more likely of the two, as the written word doesn't take much more time an effort than a Latin word. but the phonetics do. Asian pictograms consist of tens of thousands of characters that have only been condensed in recent times. But if you know the Latin alphabet and the phonetics of it, you can spell anything.
Spanish or French would be natural secondaries, French was already the international language of commerce and diplomacy once, but their colonies never really did much. As empires, they didn't have the success that Protestant nations did because of the laws the Catholic church had against usery - lending money with interest. Less re-investment in the private sector always creates less economkic success. The Jews became powerful in Europe and America because they weren't bound by such silly laws, and Muslim nations still enforce them, with the notable exception of Malaysia, the former British Colony. Even there Muslims cannot own banks because of their religion.
Really, if you want to start removing countries from the list of viable world powers, you kind of have to start with Protestant Christian nations and work down from there. If any one of them had not existed, another would have filled the gap during the schism of the Catholic Church. If it wasn't the Germans or English, the Swedes or Danes or Dutch or whoever would have provided the Enlightenment culture. I go with Germany because Martin Luther was a German and started the whole thing.
Only then can we start looking at other Latin-speaking countries due to the influence of the Roman Empire, and then after that, everyone else. It sounds terribly Euro-centric, I know, but the Chinese, Arabs, Africans, Japanese, Pacific Islanders, whatever, all had their own empires but they never spread and/or lasted. They certainly didn't create the explosion of science and culture that European empires did.
They could have. Still might. Kind of are in some cases. Wherever they can wrap their heads around individual rights. The language everyone speaks.
It says the language English no longer exists, it doesn't say any English speaking countries wouldn't exist.
That, or maybe German.
It's not, though. There are closer extant languages, one of which is cognate and often just considered a dialect and another that is almost cognate to English speakers.
Look at that cute little speck in between.
And who would have colonized those in the absence of the English?
You're literally just changing English to another language, it's not saying any English speakers or countries are gone.
Still the English, just with whichever language they developed that wasn't English.